My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2009-05-22_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981044
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981044
>
2009-05-22_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981044
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:46:51 PM
Creation date
5/26/2009 12:10:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981044
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
5/22/2009
Doc Name
Proposed Decision & Findings of Compliance for RN5
Permit Index Doc Type
Findings
Email Name
JRS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3) About one-half square mile of the Twentymile Sandstone will be undermined by <br />longwall mining in the E and F seams. Impacts to the Twentymile Sandstone <br />are very unlikely. No significant dewatering of the Twentymile is expected. <br />Twentymile water quality will not be impacted. It is unlikely any open fractures <br />will extend from the longwall areas up to the Twentymile Sandstone. <br />4) Mining in the 5 and 9 Mines will not impact the only domestic well near the <br />permit area that may be completed in the Twentymile Sandstone (Lux well). <br />5) During mining, mine dewatering discharge will cause a net increase in stream <br />flow in the Williams Fork River. <br />6) Underground mining in the Eagle Mines will not directly affect ground water in <br />the Williams Fork River alluvium. <br />7) Underground entries in the Eagle Mines that are beneath alluvium will not <br />directly affect ground water in the Yampa River alluvium. <br />8) Development mining beneath the Big Bottom alluvial valley floor of the Yampa <br />River will not impact the alluvial valley floor. <br />9) During mining of the 5 and 6 Mines, underground mine discharge from those <br />mines, combined with spoil spring discharge from the Strip Pit, will increase <br />dissolved solids concentration in the Williams Fork River. During low-flow of <br />the river and assuming worst-case mine discharges, the concentration will <br />increase by 224 mg/l, from the historical mean of 332 mg/1 to 576 mg/l. SAR <br />will increase from the historical mean of 0.44 to 5.05. The Williams Fork River <br />would have a medium salinity hazard during low flow, and would have a low to <br />moderate sodium hazard at other times. The worst-case discharges are not <br />expected to be reached based on past discharges; therefore, the medium salinity <br />hazard is not expected to be achieved. Impacts from dissolved solids loading of <br />the Williams Fork during irrigation season would be minimal due to dilution <br />resulting from high river stage. <br />10) After mining ceases, the 5 and 6 Mines will refill with water at about one-half <br />the rate of the inflow rate during mining, and it may take on the order of 16 <br />years for the mines to completely fill. <br />11) After the 5 and 6 Mines refill, water may seep from the coal subcrop into the <br />Williams Fork alluvium. The seepage would be driven by a maximum pressure <br />developing in the subcrop equal to a head of 100 ft. above the ground surface. <br />This head would cause maximum seepage of 20 gpm. In a worst-case scenario, <br />the 20 gpm discharge would raise SAR in the Williams Fork River alluvial <br />water from the historical mean of 3.6 to 9.4. The alluvial water is naturally <br />higher in dissolved solids and metals than the mine discharge water; therefore, <br />increased SAR is the only expected impact. <br />Eagle Mine Complex 23 Permit Renewal 05 <br />C-1981-044 May 22, 2009
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.