Laserfiche WebLink
r •, <br />V <br />PAGE 2 <br />3. Will the permittee continue to have a discharge point, such as pipe. <br />conduit. unlined lagoon. etc? The new Landowner does. <br />Ponds A, B, D, E & F are approved permanent <br />4. Under what conditions could a discharge occur: Storm flow. change in operation. <br />accidental spill, etc. Storm flow. <br />?. If this is a mining facility or operation. indicate whether any mine <br />drainage exists. Discuss whether there has been a historical flow. <br />There was/is no mine drainage. <br />6. Is there a downstream water user. water supply intake. etc.? <br />a. If ves, whom and where? <br />0 Yes 0No <br />(see enclosures) <br />? Yes ?No <br />b. Could they be impacted by a discharge or a spill of any <br />pollutant on-site controllable under an SPCC Plan or <br />other condition of a permit'? The Canadian River is ? Yes ao <br />approximately 2 miles from pond's discharge points. <br />NOTE: THE FOLLOWING SHOULD BE KEPT IN MIND IF YOUR PERMIT IS TERMINATED: <br />1. The permittee will still be responsible and subject to any enforcement action for any discharge or spills into state <br />waters. Should you operate your facility after your permit has been terminated and a discharge could occur, you <br />must apply for a new permit no less than 180 days prior to the discharge. It is unlawful to discharge pollutants <br />from a point source to state waters without a permit. Section 25-8-608 of the Water Quality Control Act provides <br />for assessing civil penalties of up to $10,000 per day for unlawful discharges. <br />2. In general the continued existence of a discharge point will be the basis for not terminating a permit at the request <br />of the permittee. <br />I certify under penalty of law that I have personally examined and am familiar with the information submitted herein <br />and based on my inquiry of those individuals immediately responsible for obtaining the information. I am aware that <br />there are significant penalties for submitting false information including the possibility of fine and imprisonment. See <br />18 U.S.C. 1001 and 33 U.S.C. 1319. <br />Authorized Representative <br />Date February 23, 2009 <br />Official Use Only <br />Based upon my verification of the above information obtained during my site inspection, it is my recommendation that this <br />permit be terminated. <br />District Engineer Date <br />? Yes ? No