My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2009-05-19_REVISION - C1981019
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981019
>
2009-05-19_REVISION - C1981019
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:46:40 PM
Creation date
5/19/2009 3:37:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981019
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
5/19/2009
Doc Name
4th Adequacy Review
From
DRMS
To
Colowyo Coal Company
Type & Sequence
TR72
Email Name
JRS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ORIGINAL PERMIT AREA, AND 19.5 INCHES THROUGHOUT THE <br />SOUTH TAYLOR RECLAMATION AREA. <br />4. Item Resolved in first adequacy review. <br />Reve etation [(2.05.4(2)(e) and 4.151 <br />Supplemental Introduction in amended Section 2.05.4 <br />5. Colowyo has adequately amended narrative on pages 2.05-44, 4.15-15, and <br />4.15-24. Item Resolved. <br />6. Item Resolved in first adequacy review. <br />7. Item Resolved in first adequacy review. <br />8. Item Resolved in first adequacy review. <br />Revegetation Plan in amended Section 2.05.4 <br />9. Item Resolved in first adequacy review. <br />10. Item Resolved in second adequacy review. <br />11. Item Resolved in first adequacy review. <br />12. Item Resolved in first adequacy review. <br />13. In the January 29, 2009 adequacy letter, the Division summarized previous <br />DOW/DRMS requests regarding the requirement, justification, and approaches <br />for inclusion of a limited acreage of tall shrub and aspen establishment areas in <br />future areas to be disturbed. Disturbance to date has impacted mountain shrub <br />habitats and proposed future disturbance in the South Taylor mining area will <br />disturb aspen woodland as well as mountain shrub habitats (both areas also <br />disturb big sagebrush habitat, which is the primary focus of wildlife habitat <br />revegetation efforts). The letter included the following specific request: <br />Please review previous letters from DRMS and DOW regarding this matter, <br />and provide detailed plans for the establishment of both thick soil <br />(aspen/chokecherry/serviceberry etc) planting sites and thin/rocky soil <br />(serviceberry, bitterbrush, etc.) planting sites. In our most recent meeting <br />with DOW staff, Jon Wangnild indicated that provision of a larger number <br />of smaller tall shrub and aspen planting sites would be acceptable, in lieu <br />of the two relative large planting areas that DOW had requested in their <br />April 2008 letter. This would also be acceptable to DRMS.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.