My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2009-04-29_PERMIT FILE - C1982056 (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1982056
>
2009-04-29_PERMIT FILE - C1982056 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:45:58 PM
Creation date
5/19/2009 1:58:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982056
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
4/29/2009
Doc Name
(refer to Figures EX49R-F3 and F4)
Section_Exhibit Name
Exhibit 08DD 18-Left Mine Ventilation Shaft Installation Drainage Designs (TR66)
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
113
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
r] <br />*Total contributing watershed at Pond 2 <br />25-year, 24-hour storm event (in) 2.1 <br />CNdisturbed 85 <br />CNundisturbed 81 <br />K (Soil erodibility factor) 0.1 <br />Cdisturbed 0.45 <br />Cundisturbed 0.003 <br />Ch dromulched 0.05 <br />Scenario 2: After Construction <br />After construction is complete, the disturbed area within the watershed will decrease from 4.0 ac to 2.4 <br />ac. The reduction in disturbed area occurs when the cuttings pits are constructed because they will collect <br />runoff without discharging. In addition, the completed Shaft Pad will be surfaced with a coarse gravel <br />and the Shaft Pad outslopes will be hydromulched. The gravel surfacing is expected to produce a greater <br />volume of runoff than would the disturbed condition, but the relatively coarse particle size distribution of <br />the gravel will produce runoff with a significantly lower sediment concentration. After construction of <br />the Shaft Pad installation is complete, silt fence will no longer be necessary to pre-treat runoff before it <br />enters Pond 1. The following values were applied to the Scenario 2 modeling parameters (Table 2). <br />Table 2. Scenario 2 SEDCAD Inputs <br />• <br />Parameter Value <br />Watershed Area (ac)* 5.9 total, 2.4 disturbed <br />10-year, 24-hour storm event (in) 1.8 <br />25-year, 24-hour storm event (in) 2.1 <br />CNShaft Pad 88 <br />CNundisturbed/Shaft Pad outslo a 81 <br />K (Soil erodibili factor) 0.1 <br />CShaft Pad 0.05 <br />Cundisturbed 0.003 <br />Ch dromulched 0.05 <br />*Total contributing watershed at Pond 1 <br />The following pond elevation-area-capacity data were input into Pond 1 in SEDCAD (Table 3): <br />Table 3. Pond 1 Elevation-Area-Capacity <br /> <br />Elevation (ft amsl) Area (ac) Capacity (ac-ft) References <br />6862 .000 .000 Bottom of and <br />6863 .088 .029 <br />6864 .106 .126 <br />6865 .126 .242 <br />6866 .147 .378 <br />6867 .170 .536 <br />6868 .194 .718 Emergency spillway <br />6869 .220 .924 <br />6870 .247 1.158 <br />6871 .276 1.419 <br />Twentytmile Coal Company 18L Shaft Pad 4 Water & Earth Technologies, Inc. <br />Drainage and Sediment Control System Design March 2, 2009
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.