Laserfiche WebLink
New Horizon Mine TR-58 <br />3rd Adequacy Review <br />30 April 2009 <br />Page 3 of 4 <br />5. The soil type/map unit symbols for the soil types listed in Table (e)-6 on page (e)- <br />19I and Jim Boyd's letter [page (e)-19K] are from the 1986 San Miguel Soil <br />Survey, and do not correspond with the map unit symbols used in the Soils <br />Baseline section of the application (listed on Map 2..04.9-1). For clarification, <br />please amend Table (e)-6 to include corresponding map unit names and also <br />include, on Map 2.05.4(2)(e)-1, a tabular listing of all map unit symbols <br />referenced in Mr. Boyd's letter, with corresponding map unit names, similar to <br />the tables provided on Map 2.04.9-1. <br />On amended Map 2.05.4(2)(e)-1, the tabular listing of map unit symbols and <br />corresponding map unit descriptions was provided as requested, with the <br />exception that one of the map units in the permit area was omitted (Map Unit <br />82-Progresso loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes). <br />Please provide a revised Man 2.05.4(2)(e)-1, with Map Unit 82 included in the <br />Man Unit Symbol/Description table. <br />6. The reference area production weighting procedure is described on page (e)-19I. <br />We have a recommendation to clarify the wording in the 5t' sentence of the first <br />paragraph, as follows: <br />This weighted average factor is then divided by the reference area <br />weighted average adjustment factor (1. 022), and the resulting <br />value is multiplied by the reference area production sample mean <br />to obtain the adjusted reference area sample mean. The <br />production standard for that particular reclaimed block is [90% <br />of/ the adjusted reference area sample mean. <br />Please consider the recommended wording and amend the paragraph as <br />appropriate. <br />The narrative was amended as requested. Item Resolved. <br />7. To conform with commitments regarding grazing management of the reference. <br />area, the timeframe for success demonstration sampling in the third paragraph on <br />page (e)-19L (... during the May through September growing season), should be <br />revised. Please amend the wording to clarify that measurements will be made in <br />late May/Early June immediately prior to 1 S` cut harvest of the reclaimed fields <br />and prior to any growing season livestock grazing in the reference area. <br />The narrative was amended as requested. Item Resolved. <br />8. On page (e)-19, as a part of the proposed "quality standard", the narrative <br />indicates that "no more than 3% relative production will be comprised of county <br />listed noxious species". The Division's policy is that noxious species are not <br />allowed to contribute to achievement of cover or production success standards.