My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-04-15_REVISION - M1980244 (351)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1980244
>
2008-04-15_REVISION - M1980244 (351)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 5:52:10 PM
Creation date
4/27/2009 11:48:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980244
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
4/15/2008
Doc Name
Teller County Vol. 1, Attachment 4, 8.6 to 14.0
From
CC&V
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM9
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• 12.4 Calculation of Production Rates for Equipment <br />Using the volumes and areas computed for the various facilities to accomplish <br />reclamation, production rates (aka "productivities") for the selected equipment were <br />developed in the spreadsheets, taking into account such factors as characteristics of <br />materials handled (i.e., loose, hard, wet, dense, etc.), haul distance, grade resistance, <br />operator efficiency, equipment utilization rate, capacity of loader buckets and truck beds, <br />etc. There were several references used in this exercise, including the Caterpillar <br />Performance Handbook (33 - 36th editions), actual reclamation time studies in the files <br />of Ellis, and engineering judgment. <br />12.5 Calculation of Revegetation Costs <br />Various seed mixtures used at CC&V have been evaluated and improved as appropriate <br />during the course of the mining operations to continue to obtain species best suited for <br />reclaiming the Cresson Project. It is CC&V's experience that certain species will be <br />replaced with improved native or adapted species capable of supporting the wildlife <br />habitat and livestock grazing post-mining land uses. Revegetation costs are based on <br />actual costs for current seed mixes in use, tree / shrub transplants, and the estimated cost <br />of conventional fertilizer application, seedbed preparation, broadcast seeding, and <br />• hydromulching, as well as estimated costs for helicopter fertilizing and seeding. <br />Revegetation costs also include the costs for liming for the ECOSA in the unlikely event <br />that it is necessary.. <br />12.6 Calculation of Demolition Costs <br />The demolition cost for most structures was taken directly from the latest version of R.S. <br />Means Heavy Construction Cost Data for 2008, using the dimensions of the structure and <br />simply applying an appropriate cost per unit of volume. This cost estimate does not <br />account for the salvage value or the scrap metal value of materials generated during a <br />large-scale project. It is the experience of Michael D. Ellis, P.E., author of this <br />reclamation cost estimate, that significant scrap value (particularly steel and copper) <br />exists in large scale mine demolition projects and in most cases, with today's scrap <br />market, demolition and building reclamation costs can be fully recovered by the salvage <br />value generated. As such, the current reclamation cost estimate significantly overstates <br />the liability of CC&V building demolition. <br />12.7 Calculation of Detoxification Costs <br />The detoxification procedure for the VLF is consistent with prior submittals and includes <br />using two pore volumes of water to rinse with a series of resting and rinsing periods <br />• Cripple Creek & Victor Gold Mining Company <br />Cresson Project Mine Life Extension <br />12-5
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.