My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2009-03-17_REVISION - M1988044
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1988044
>
2009-03-17_REVISION - M1988044
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/16/2021 6:18:57 PM
Creation date
4/2/2009 8:30:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1988044
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
3/17/2009
Doc Name
Adequacy Review
From
DRMS
To
Schmidt Construction Company
Type & Sequence
TR4
Email Name
JLE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DIVISION OF: RECLAMATION, MINING AND;SAFETY <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman St.; Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: (303) 866-3567 <br />FAX: (303) 832-8106 <br />COLORADO <br />DIv.ISION OF <br />RECLAMATION <br />MINING <br />SAFETY <br />March 17, 2009 f <br />Bill Ritter, Jr. <br />Governor <br />Harris D. Sherman <br />Executive Director <br />Ronald W. Cattany <br />Division Director. <br />Mr. Scott Davis Natural Resource Trustee <br />Schmidt Construction•.Conipany <br />2635 Delta Drive <br />Colorado Springs, CO: 80910 <br />Re: M-19887044, Coal Creek Resources, Technical Revision TR04 Adequacy <br />Review <br />Dear Mr. Davis, <br />On February 23'd, 2009 the.-Division received your request for a Technical Revision for <br />the above referenced mine site. The decision date'for this revision is March 25th, 2009. <br />There are several issues that will need to be addressed prior to the approval of this <br />Revision. If you need more time to respond to this review please request an extension for <br />the decision date for this revision. Please keep in mind, that the Division will need time <br />to review your response. If there are still outstanding issues that have not been resolved <br />by the decision date and an extension has not been requested, the Technical Revision will. <br />be denied. <br />Introduction: <br />For clarity purposes, the following section describes what the Division perceives as the <br />current status of the mine site and the various definitions that are used for-this mine, site. <br />Hopefully this process clarifies what the current parameters permitted for this site are and <br />what information needs to be updated. <br />First, to summarize what you are requesting in your current Technical Revision... about 21 <br />acres of land that was potentially to be affected during the mining operation will no <br />longer be potentially affected due to the fact the an endangered butterfly may be present <br />in the area to. be removed. <br />In Amendment 03, you offered:the following definitions for categories of acreage <br />involved' in the mining operation: <br />STATE OF-COLORADO'.' <br />Office of Office of <br />`Mined Land Reclamation Denver . rrand hinrtinn . ni,mna, A-:.... __., ',:___
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.