My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2007-11-20_REVISION - M1982015 (14)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1982015
>
2007-11-20_REVISION - M1982015 (14)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/16/2021 6:12:41 PM
Creation date
3/18/2009 4:24:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1982015
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
11/20/2007
Doc Name
Addendum 1 to Integrated Corrective Action Plan
From
E-21 Engineering, Inc.
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
TR3
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
7.2 Groundwater Flow Regime and Contaminant Fate & Transport <br />The wells were gauged for depth to water to determine groundwater elevations, and <br />sampled on March 14, and April 21, 2007 for BTEX and TVPH analysis. The laboratory <br />results are illustrated on Figures 6 and 7, respectively. The groundwater gauging and <br />laboratory results are summarized on Tables 5 and 6, respectively. The laboratory <br />reports for the sampling are included in Appendix 4. <br />The slurry wall was completed in early March 2007. Based on previous groundwater <br />elevation surveys as reported in the ICAP, groundwater flowed northerly from the St. <br />Wain River towards Big Lake largely due to the fact that Big Lake was drained and the <br />St. Wain River flow volume was high due to extensive snows over the winter. However, <br />with the completion of the slurry wall and dewatering Sunset Lake, the hydrologic regime <br />is more dynamic than before. Based on the March 14, 2007 elevations, groundwater <br />flow is still generally northerly; however flow from the St. Wain River is obstructed by the <br />slurry wall. Groundwater flow from the area of the release just north of the slurry wall is <br />also northerly since the ponds are both drained. <br />Elevated BTEX concentrations were detected in MW-18 which is near the location of the <br />"sump" in the SHT that was excavated to the east of the pipeline release point. These <br />contaminants are effectively trapped by the northerly groundwater flow traveling from the <br />St. Wain River toward the slurry wall. It is expected that as flow declines through the <br />summer and fall months, groundwater flow should reverse somewhat and begin to flow <br />more downstream. <br />There are 12 wells located to the north of the slurry wall. All of the wells contain <br />elevated BTEX and TVPH concentrations. Since both the quarry ponds have been <br />drained to the north of the slurry wall, groundwater is still flowing northerly toward the <br />hydrostatic low. Due to the dewatering activities, contaminant transport is likely being <br />accelerated and the plume to the north of the slurry wall is growing. If the ponds are <br />refilled, the groundwater flow should reverse to the south and southeast depending on <br />the respective pond elevations. This would tend to trap the contaminants against the <br />slurry wall and possibly minimize growth of the plume. However, refilling of the quarry <br />ponds is not anticipated to be performed in the next several months. <br />8.0 Air-Sparge and Soil Vapor Extraction Pilot Testing Activities <br />On March 22, 2007, E-21 performed air-sparge (AS) and soil vapor extraction (SVE) <br />pilot testing. Based on the hydrogeology at the site and E-21 personnel experience with <br />successful AS / SVE remediation at nearby locations, it was deemed very likely that this <br />remedial method would be very effective for the site conditions. The site is underlain by <br />a silty and sandy clay to approximately 8 feet bgs and changes to a fine sand which <br />grades into a sandy gravel. Claystone bedrock is present ranging from 18 to 24 feet <br />bgs. <br />On March 12, 2007, one, 2-inch diameter AS, and one, 2-inch diameter, SVE well were <br />' installed at the site. The wells were 19 and 12 feet deep, respectively. Depth to <br />groundwater at the time of these well installations was approximately 14 feet bgs. The <br />AS well was screened from 17 to 19 feet below the ground surface and the SVE well <br />' were screened from 5 to 12 feet bgs. The pilot testing wells were placed near the <br />pipeline release area at select distances from surrounding monitoring wells for purposes <br />of collecting sparging and vent pressure to determine radii of influence. <br />9
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.