My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-03-05_REVISION - M1997054 (24)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1997054
>
2008-03-05_REVISION - M1997054 (24)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/16/2021 6:18:55 PM
Creation date
3/18/2009 4:08:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1997054
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
3/5/2008
Doc Name
Extension Request
From
Civil Resources, LLC
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
TR4
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Based on the results reported in these geotechnical testing summaries, in conjunction with existing <br />geologic records of the area in and around the granite quarry, dewatering is unexpected at this <br />time. Thus, anticipated impacts to adjacent groundwater systems are expected to be negligible. <br />The operator does acknowledge that granitic fractures may exist within the quarry that contain <br />subsurface water, and they propose that should such a fracture be unearthed immediate action to <br />ensure the absence of injury to any adjacent water user will be taken. <br />CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br />The effects of the dewatering operation at the Parkdale Aggregate Mine should not result in adverse <br />impacts to existing structures, including wells. The maximum drawdown at any existing well due to <br />the mining operation is expected to be less than half a foot principally due to the presence of the <br />constant head boundary of the Arkansas River. <br />COLLECTION OF MONITORING DATA <br />The analytical approach discussed herein was made necessary by the lack of existing monitoring <br />well data in area. This approach does however present a very conservative estimate of the <br />potential maximum drawdown anticipated during mining operations. <br />Prior to commencement of dewatering operations, the operator may need to install monitoring <br />wells to collect pre-mining ground water data, as required by the DRW. The wells should be located <br />throughout the permit area, spaced at regular intervals as needed. The monitoring should continue <br />throughout the duration of mining. The collection of this data would allow for more detailed <br />analysis of impacts during and post-mining and evaluation of potential mitigation measures should <br />they become necessary. <br />The collection of monitoring data would also allow the comparison of actual drawdown <br />surrounding the pit and the modeled results presented herein. It is expected that the predicted <br />effects would exceed the actual effects due to the conservative nature of the modeled parameters. <br />However, if the actual effects are greater than those predicted mitigation measures may be <br />required. <br />MITIGATION OF IMPACTS DURING MINING <br />The largest impacts on the surrounding hydrologic balance will be confined to the areas to the west <br />and northwest of the site. Though we do not expect any adverse impacts to existing structures, the <br />operator should be prepared to instigate mitigation measures should they become necessary. <br />Possible mitigation measures include: <br />• Providing substitute supplies of water to wells adversely impacted by the dewatering <br />operation; <br />• Deepening of existing wells or lowering of existing pumps therein; <br />' • Placement of recharge trenches bordering the site to help alleviate impacts to the <br />surrounding ground water table, and <br />Parkdale Aggregate Mine I Conclusions and Recommendations •
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.