Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Eric Scott <br />March 10, 2009 <br />Page 6 of 9 <br />It is our understanding that Gravel Mining operations can be permitted by the DRMS with <br />the commitment that no ground water will be exposed until an approved Temporary <br />Substitute Supply Plan (TSSP) is in place for the site. The existing activities are covered <br />by the existing, approved TSSP. A copy of the approved TSSP for the site is attached. <br />Prior to release of the bonding on the site, the applicant will provide proof of a SEO and <br />Court approved Augmentation plan for any evaporative losses from unlined ground water <br />ponds within the permit area. <br />6.4.8 EXHIBIT H - Wildlife Information <br />This section is adequate as submitted. <br />6.4.9 EXHIBIT I - Soils Information <br />This section is adequate as submitted. <br />6 4 10 EXHIBIT 3 - Vegetation Information <br />This section is adequate as submitted. <br />6.4.11 EXHIBIT K - Climate Information <br />This section is adequate as submitted. <br />6.4.12 EXHIBIT L - Reclamation Costs <br />The reclamation plan costs provided in this application are incomplete and a bit confusing. <br />The biggest omission is that no actual breakdown of specific tasks or costs has been <br />provided. Also the text of this section states that the area is within the existing permit <br />area, is currently bonded, and no additional bonding would be required. This statement <br />seems to be a bit contradictory with the amendment application. Perhaps what is being <br />implied here is a phased bonding approach with a total on-site disturbance of no more <br />than 53 acres? Please clarify. <br />Aggregate Industries needs to prepare a bond estimate broken down by task and cost for <br />each task of reclamation at the projected time of the maximum disturbance of the site. <br />This estimate will be reviewed by DRMS once the remaining adequacy issues such as <br />maximum amount of backfill to be placed; total acres requiring topsoil replacement and <br />seeding, and all other tasks for the projected maximum disturbance have been clarified. <br />Also, it appears that no costs for several listed features, such as the proposed underpass to <br />Cell 4, or for removal of the conveyors, etc., have been included in the list of tasks <br />submitted. DRMS will review the reclamation cost estimate provided, and if necessary <br />prepare an estimate itself, if the provided estimate appears to be incomplete or <br />inadequate. <br />We anticipate that the area of maximum disturbance within the amended mining area will <br />occur at the beginning of mining of Cell 4. Cell 5 will be stripped and operating as the <br />r 0" <br />r610%