My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-11-24_PERMIT FILE - C1996083 (14)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1996083
>
2008-11-24_PERMIT FILE - C1996083 (14)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:38:13 PM
Creation date
2/23/2009 5:37:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996083
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
11/24/2008
Doc Name
Geotechnical Evaluation of Mine-Induced Seismicity on Bruce Park Dam, GEI Consultants, June 2002
Section_Exhibit Name
Volume X Bruce Park Dam Geotechnical Studies
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
100
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Geotechnical Evaluation of Mine-Induced Earthquakes on Bruce Park Dam <br />Bowie Resources, Limited <br />June 2002 <br />• Section 5- Conclusions <br />Based on the results of the evaluations performed and documented in this report, we <br />conclude the following: <br />1. Bruce Park Dam and Bruce Park Saddle Dam should not be adversely impacted <br />from mine-induced seismicity generated from long wall mining at the Bowie <br />Resources mine for the following reasons: <br />a. The dams and foundations consist of clays soils that are not susceptible to <br />liquefaction during seismic loading. <br />b. Permanent deformations of the dam and saddle dam during seismic loading <br />should be insignificant because the expected ground motions (accelerations) at <br />the dam and saddle dam sites are less than the computed yield acceleration. The <br />applied acceleration needs to be greater than the yield acceleration for significant <br />deformations to occur'. <br />c. The dam and saddle dam are generally homogeneous earthen structures without <br />distinct internal zones of materials having significantly different properties and <br />without an inlet tower or other type of structure that would behave independently <br />during seismic loading <br />• 2. The computed static factor of safety for the existing landslide depends on the pore <br />water conditions in the slope and would range from about 1.1 to 2.0 for phreatic <br />surfaces ranging from the ground surface to the top of bedrock, respectively. <br />3. A permanent deformation of about 9 inches may occur in the existing landslide if a <br />rare magnitude 4.2 mine-induced seismic event occurs under conditions where the <br />phreatic surface in the landslide is at the ground surface. If the phreatic surface is at <br />mid-depth or at the bottom of the landslide, a rare magnitude 4.2 event would <br />generate permanent deformations of 1.5 and 0.3 inches, respectively. <br />4. No cumulative deformation of the landslide is expected if the phreatic surface is at or <br />below the mid-depth of the landslide and mining activities over a 2-year period <br />generate a total of 100 magnitude 1.75 events, 20 magnitude 2.0 events, and 5 <br />magnitude 2.5 events. <br />5. Cumulative deformation of the landslide is expected to be about 11 inches if the <br />phreatic surface remains at the ground surface and mining activities over a 2-year <br />02-05-22 Geotechincal Evaluation of Mine-Induced Earthquakes <br />• ' Item 1 b amended (applied and yield reversed) by J. E. Stover 12/22/06 with authority from BRL. <br />19 12/22/06 <br />ri2-16 <br />A PPROVO <br />I1Z 4/a 8
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.