My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-12-17_REVISION - C1981019 (160)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981019
>
2010-12-17_REVISION - C1981019 (160)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:28:04 PM
Creation date
1/29/2009 4:07:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981019
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
12/17/2010
Doc Name
Exhibit 10 Item 6 Proposed Collom Project Baseline Vegetation Survey
Type & Sequence
PR3
Email Name
JRS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
131
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
or, 300 stems per acre with documentation of a positive recruitment rate on reclaimed shrub communities <br />in Colowyo reclamation. Similarly, in ecotonal areas, we would meet 200 stems per acre after 10 years,, <br />or 65 stems per acre with documentation of a positive recruitment rate on reclaimed shrub communities in <br />Colowyo reclamation. On grassland communities (80% of targeted. reclamation), no woody plants should <br />be required, however, if shrub communities evolve, they would count toward the wildlife habitat goal. <br />Furthermore, there cannot be a requirement for the designed community to in fact evolve, as nature often <br />does not co-operate as we hope. Although mountain shrub may be attempted in certain instances, <br />growth and development of a sagebrush community would still be considered successful. In addition, <br />there may need to be some relaxation of the ground cover and production success criteria in these areas <br />of "special reclamation". For example, a 20% reduction in each parameter over reference area values <br />may be appropriate because encouragement of shrubs and forbs will be at the expense of grasses. <br />The solution to the second source of the problem of achieving adequate woody plant density has been <br />indicated above whereby flexibility must be built into success criteria so that if a positive recruitment rate <br />can be shown to exist, there is no need to achieve elevated densities within a 10-year period. However, <br />there will likely be instances, if not an overall need, to incorporate managerial practices to encourage <br />positive recruitment to the shrub populations. Such management may include the following steps: <br />1. Use of limited livestock (cattle) grazing to select against grasses and for shrubs and forbs. <br />2. Use of elk-proof fencing to preclude access into the maturing shrub populations on core areas. <br />3. Use of orchard grass (Dactylis glomerata) in key reclamation locations to encourage elk away <br />from maturing shrub populations. (Cedar Creek has determined that this introduced grass is <br />highly sought by the local elk populations. Well over 90% of observed plants in reclamation have <br />been observed to have received heavy utilization by elk.) <br />The solution to the third source of the problem continues to result from Colowyo's research into <br />revegetation methods and procedures that encourage shrub populations over grasslands. Primary <br />among these is what can be described as a "prescribed ecosystem reclamation approach" or PERA. The <br />principal basis of this reclamation approach is to rebuild the foundation conditions (soil structure and <br />profile) of target vegetation communities on the appropriate aspects, slopes, and topographic features of <br />the reclaimed landscape as indicated (in a preliminary manner) on Figure 1. In this manner, the target <br />community, as opposed to simple grasslands will be more strongly encouraged. Additional techniques <br />may include: use of only native species, avoidance of fertilization, severe reduction of grasses in the seed <br />mix, placement of thin layers of topsoil over overburden, placement of zero topsoil, or placement of thin <br />layers of overburden over topsoil. All of these possible techniques are designed to diminish the <br />competitive advantage of grasses, at least in the early stages of establishment and growth. <br />In summary, this PERA approach on the "20% areas" would be based on the community development <br />contributory factors of: soil quantity, quality, and replacement depth; aspect, slope, and 'landform; <br />documented and expected performance of various floral species; and the post-mining land use. In this <br />CEMARCREIKA M®CUA795,INC. Page 52 2005 Collom Vegetation Survey
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.