My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-12-17_REVISION - C1981019 (160)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981019
>
2010-12-17_REVISION - C1981019 (160)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:28:04 PM
Creation date
1/29/2009 4:07:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981019
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
12/17/2010
Doc Name
Exhibit 10 Item 6 Proposed Collom Project Baseline Vegetation Survey
Type & Sequence
PR3
Email Name
JRS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
131
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />In addition to the PCQ data, canopy cover at each sample point was visually estimated by the <br />observer. It is important to note that the aspen canopy at over half the sample points was substantially <br />reduced due to the recent die-off of mature trees (most likely due to the recent drought). <br />2.7 Sample Adequacy Determination <br />Within each community type (baseline or reference area), sampling for ground cover and production <br />was conducted to a minimum of 20 samples. From these initial samples, a mean and standard deviation <br />for each variable was calculated. Where statistical testing is required (for the establishment of qualified <br />reference areas), collection of an adequate sample (nmin) is typically necessary to insure reliable <br />estimates of the population (e.g., estimates to within 10% of the true mean (p) with 90% confidence). <br />The Cochran formula below was utilized in accordance with directives in Colorado's guidelines (1988). <br />When the inequality (nmin <_ n) is true, sampling can be considered to be adequate, and nmin is <br />determined as follows: <br />nmin = (t2S2) I (0.1x)2 <br /> <br />• <br />Where: n = the number of actual samples collected with a minimum of 20 in each unit; <br />t = the value from the t distribution for 90% confidence with n-1 degrees of freedom; <br />s2 - the variance of the estimate as calculated from the initial samples; <br />x = the mean of the estimate as calculated from the initial samples. <br />If the initial minimum number of samples in each area did not provide a suitable estimate of the <br />mean (i.e., the inequality was false), additional samples were collected until the inequality (nmin S n) <br />became true. Only two areas required additional sampling (Juniper Scrub and Bottomland Baseline <br />Areas) where 39 and 17 additional production samples were collected. <br />2.8 Reference Area Comparability <br />When reference areas are utilized as revegetation standards of success for vegetation cover and <br />production, demonstrations are required prior to permit issuance to document that the selected reference <br />areas are statistically comparable (equal) to the vegetation types for which they represent. The pre- <br />mining demonstration of reference area comparability was made using the two-tailed Students t-test as <br />indicated below. Reference area production and cover are compared at the 95% confidence limit (alpha <br />at 0.05 level) with the respective baseline area production and cover. The sample "P' statistic (t-*) is <br />calculated as follows: <br />CIEDA1R CMMK AM Cll TME, INC. <br />Page 10 <br />2005 Collom Vegetation Survey
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.