Laserfiche WebLink
.vy;aQ4~yyy~~;,iy, . ,.~~~ ~i V ~:~y~;F ... <br /> ~1 [~'~ISf. .~M V'frfF~1.® <br /> <br /> <br /> ..• .. , <br />... .. .R~. ....y ., 'd'. Mi ~.. <br /> !.': <br /> TD: Board of Corrissioners <br />~- <br />RECEIVED SEP 1 <br /> <br />9999 <br />This land use change has engendered rang tolls, ranging fror general complaints about 'having to live <br />with the dust that Bill Benr rakes and doesn't have to live next to,' Loan overwhelring torrent by 5orerset resi- <br />de~rts that while they night not necessarily appose what Hear proposes, they really dcn't know chat Lhe proposal is. <br />Yhot the yroposal actually is, fror the land use standpoint, is o request to subdivide Lot 7 in Sorerset, <br />nov omed by Foy Carden. The purchase of the portion of the lot will facilitate the relocation of Bear's access <br />onto Highway 133. No one who celled expressed opposition to the split. <br />Bear argues that continuing to lease a portion of Dove Bradley's property to provide access is virtually pro- <br />hibitive, and that because their lease with hir ends January 8, they wst be oFf his property 6y then, and sa <br />rust hove constructed the new access by then. Bradley wonders why Bear is in such a hurry when they've had a <br />caiple of years ord several ronihs to pursue an alternative. Bear suggests Bradely doesn't support the change <br />to access because he's gaining sore 144,000 per year in lease paycents fror Bear. Bndley suggests Bear's tryirg <br />`:o pull o fast one. No resolution of THAT issue fror the plannirg folks. <br />I hove been in contact with Joe Vickers of the Deparlrent of Highways, who contends that the design Far <br />thx rew access is in line wish the Deparirent's highway access perritting code. Bear received o pewit in January <br />of 1Y32, wd renewed it in January of this year. The arended penit, allowing the change in location of 3D-4D <br />feet fror the present location, has been verbally approved, according to Vickers, Dut has not been issued in written <br />fan. Vickers, order whose jurisdiction this North Fork strekh of Hwy 133 lies, indicates the pewit orerdrent <br />request will be approved, and that the Dept. of Highways is satisfied that the entrance is safe and well-designed. <br />The people of Sorerset who tolled said trucks pulling aui onto the highway are safety hazards, and that <br />there have been two near-risses between trucks aM school Yids. A condition of the original Dept. of Highwuys <br />peroit was that trucY,s not turn east onto the highway; Pear indicates that condition has been ref, and that <br />there should be rm reason for trucks to turn in that direction, because Bear uses the loading facility as Bowie, <br />to the nest. <br />Erar's request to expedite this review is based, according to Bear, upon o recent design suggestion by <br />the fin's engineer to pursue the acquisition of a portion of Lot 7, and on Bear's traditional closing of the <br />nine operation between Christras and Neu Tear's, a space of fire which would afford tine enough in which to <br />construct the access. Nod the Planning Corrission conducted a reefing Decerber 2 reetirg, there possibly voild <br />riot be the sore sense of irrediacy. However, I requested the additional road profile inforration, and a letter <br />fror Mrs. Carden reflecting her agreerent wish Bear, and road irdorration which generally would not be requested <br />of a rinor irpact. Given the potential controversy of this proposal, that inforraticn was necessary. <br />FFRI: Joome Yilliars/Gunnison County Ploming Corrission <br />RE: Bear Coal lard use change and charge of access <br />;_ ~~,; <br />V . <br />