My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2009-01-20_REVISION - M2006084
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M2006084
>
2009-01-20_REVISION - M2006084
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:42:59 PM
Creation date
1/27/2009 9:34:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2006084
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
1/20/2009
Doc Name
Second adequacy review
From
DRMS
To
Greg Lewicki & Associates
Email Name
THM
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
5) In Exhibit E, it is stated that the lake surface is proposed to be 48.92 acres. The Reclamation Map indicates <br />that the final reclaimed lake is proposed to be 18.8 acres. Please clarify the correct amount of proposed lake <br />surface acreage. <br />- The revised Map F submitted indlakeecreated inlfinal rec amation w 11 be 48.92 acreses. Please submit <br />a revised map that states that the <br />6) In Exhibit E, part 1. of the General Reclamation Plan indicates that 19.37 acres of wetlands are proposed. <br />This amount is different than the amounamou t of we ands to be onstructed lsof 38.71 acres of wetland. <br />Please specify what the correct proposed <br />- The revised Map F submitted indicates that the wetland shelf will be approximately 19.45 acres. <br />Please submit a revised map that states that the wetland shelf created in final reclamation will be <br />19.37 acres. <br />7) In Exhibit J, the last statement on page J-1, "See the letter from USACOE on the following page ". There is <br />not a letter on the following page. Please provide the referenced letter from the USACOE if it does actually <br />exist. <br />- Response adequate <br />8) In Exhibit L, Item No. 5, the wetland shelf is described as being 10.6 acres and on the final reclamation map <br />it is noted as being 38.71 acres. Please explain why the reclamation figure only accounts for 10.6 acres of <br />the total 38.71 acres. Please submit a reviled Wetland shelf. o account for the additional reclamation required <br />to complete the spreading of topsoil over t <br />- Response adequate <br />9) Per Rule 6.2.1, all maps must be prepared and signed by a registered land surveyor, professional engineer, <br />or other qualified person; date prepared must be shown. Please submit a Mine Plan map and Reclamation <br />Plan map that are signed and dated by the map maker. <br />Please provide a response to the listed issues a ann ~ ae pondbby January 26,12009 please subm00a writ n request <br />date of February 4, 2009 can be met. If you c p <br />to extend the decision date. If your response or a written extension request is not received by January 26, 2009 <br />the application may be denied. <br />If you need additional information, please contact me at the Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety, Grand <br />Junction Field Office, 101 S. 3rd St., Suite 301, Grand Junction, Colorado 81501, telephone no. 970.241.2042. <br />Sincerely, <br />Travis Marshall <br />Environmental Protection Specialist <br />Cc: Steve Shuey, DRMS <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.