My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-12-22_REPORT - C1980001 (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Coal
>
C1980001
>
2008-12-22_REPORT - C1980001 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:39:10 PM
Creation date
12/23/2008 10:58:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980001
IBM Index Class Name
REPORT
Doc Date
12/22/2008
Doc Name
2006 Vegetation Sampling Report
From
WWC Engineering
To
DRMS
Permit Index Doc Type
Reveg Monitoring Report
Email Name
JDM
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2006 Edna Mine Vegetation Sampling Report <br />1. Overview <br />The information provided this report follows Colorado Division of Reclamation, Mining, and <br />Safety (DRMS) requirements to verify that vegetation at The Pittsburg and Midway Coal Mining <br />Company's Edna Mine meets the standards established in the mine reclamation plan. The <br />information provided in this report constitutes year two of the two years of required information. <br />The Edna Mine is located approximately four miles north of Oak Creek, Colorado. <br />1.1. Sampling Methodology <br />Vegetation sampling was conducted in accordance with the Edna Mine Vegetation Final Bond <br />Release Monitoring Plan, dated April 8, 2005, approved by the Colorado DRMS. A copy of this <br />plan is available on file at the Colorado DRMS. Vegetation sampling was conducted at the Edna <br />Mine from August 28 through September 5, 2006. The survey was conducted by Richard <br />Bonine, Jr. and Lindsey Brandt of Habitat Management, Inc. <br />1.2. Performance Standards and Statistical Analysis <br />Statistical analysis of all data collected was conducted as described in the Colorado DRMS's <br />Guideline Regarding Selected Coal Mine Bond Release Issues, April 18, 1995 ("Bond Release <br />Guideline"). When the reclaimed area parameter sample mean is equal to or greater than 90% <br />of the reference area sample mean (or weighted mean), or 90% of the approved technical <br />standard, then reclaimed vegetation is considered successful for that parameter. In order to <br />make a direct comparison, the sample size(s) must meet sample adequacy requirements. Table <br />1-1 below presents the Edna Mine Bonded Reclaimed Units & Vegetation Performance <br />Standards of the Bond Release Units (BRUs). <br />T?hle 4_4. r-Ann Mina Rnndari Rpclaimpd Units & Vegetation Performance Standards <br /> Vegetation Parameter <br />Reclaimed Bond Bonded Acres <br />' Shrub <br />Release Unit (BRU) (approximate) Cover Production Diversity Density <br /> Min 5 Species <br />West Ridge Topsoiled 22 Reference Area Comparison between 3 & <br />40% Rel N.A. <br />BRU . <br /> Importance <br /> 90% grass <br />West Ridge BRU: 466 47% N.A. 5% (orbs N.A. <br />No-Topsoil 5%tree/shrub <br /> Min 5 Species Min 1000 <br /> <br />Moffat Topsoiled BRU <br />215 <br />Reference Area Comparison between 3 & <br />40% Rel. Stems er <br />p <br /> Importance acre <br /> 90% grass <br />Moffat BRU: 224 47% N.A. 5% forbs N.A. <br />No-Topsoil 5%tree/shrub <br />1 Diversity Standard for No-Topsoil units is voluntary <br />' Additionally, two reference areas (snowberry sage vegetation community and oak mountain <br />shrub vegetation community) were sampled for cover and production to establish vegetation <br />bond release standards. The snowberry sage vegetation community represents 83% of the pre- <br />Habitat Management, Inc. 1 October 19, 2006
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.