My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2007-11-16_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981041 (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981041
>
2007-11-16_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981041 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/19/2020 1:04:56 PM
Creation date
12/18/2008 8:50:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981041
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
11/16/2007
Doc Name
Proposed Decision & Findings of Compliance for RN5
Permit Index Doc Type
Findings
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The fourth water bearing zone is the Rollins sandstone, which is stratigraphically below the coal <br />seam to be mined. This unit is comprised of a clean, tan-to-cream sandstone that ranges from 89 <br />to 114 feet thick throughout the permit area. Due to the extreme depth (from 50 to 1900 feet <br />below surface) and location of the mining operation, it is believed that no damaging effect to the <br />hydrologic properties of the Rollins will occur. To date, there has been no significant impact on <br />this unit. <br />Additional issues that affect the hydrology of the site include waste pile impact on groundwater <br />supplies, in particular leachate generation. The effect of leachate from the Roadside coal <br />processing waste pile (RSRDA) on water quality is negligible. Using the worst-case scenario, <br />where all precipitation enters the waste pile, an average of 0.01 cfs would enter the Colorado <br />River via alluvium percolation. This would have the effect of raising the total dissolved solids <br />content of the Colorado River by 0.01 percent. There is no evidence that leachate from the pile <br />has ever reached or affected the Colorado River. <br />The two other refuse piles, CRDA Nos. 1 and 2, located across the Colorado River from the <br />facility area, have more hydrologic control due to geographic and structural features. All <br />leachate, should it occur, is routed to sediment ponds. CRDA No. 1, in addition, has a series of <br />rock underdrains that would channel the leachate to the sediment pond directly. Since neither <br />CRDA-1 nor CRDA-2 are underlain by alluvium, the area provides a more stable environment <br />for leachate detection and minimization. During the period of active use, minor intermittent <br />seepage was observed from the rock underdrains beneath CRDA-1, and from widely scattered <br />seep areas on the CRDA-1 and CRDA-2 bench outslopes. <br />Groundwater Quantity <br />Possible hydrologic impacts on groundwater quantity by the underground mining operation <br />include: <br />1. The effect of subsidence and the related dewatering of the area, and <br />2. The effect of additional water added to the Colorado alluvial system from mine <br />inflow being discharged through the mine and to the surface. <br />Groundwater Quantity: Effect due to Subsidence <br />Groundwater quantity will initially be affected due to subsidence activity in the Rapid Creek <br />basin. The effect will be temporary in nature and provide no material damage to downstream <br />users. To quote from the Brooks study of 1986 on the operation's potential impact to the area, <br />"Mining coal in the Mesaverde Group temporarily will dewater the rock adjacent to the <br />underground mine. This rock will become rubblized and increase the permeability of the rock <br />thus increasing the flow of groundwater into the area." Inflow in the mine is expected to <br />increase as a result with a secondary effect of lowering the potentiometric surface temporarily. <br />Water levels should return to pre-mining levels after the underground mine is sealed, with <br />saturation occurring after several years. The mine utilized limited extraction methods in the <br />Cottonwood and Rapid Creek areas. <br />Past monitoring of the alluvium of Rapid and Cottonwood Creeks has not detected any <br />significant depletion of alluvial water in either creek system, and no significant depletion is <br />Permit Renewal No. 5 33 November 16, 2007
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.