Laserfiche WebLink
Response to Adequacy Letter <br />Technical Revision 6, M-1981-207 <br />1 February 2008 <br />Page 2 <br />plant facility, it is noted that an angle of repose of at least 30 degrees is expected with <br />the substrate on the site. The footprint of operations versus active side slopes supports <br />settling to the angle of repose in the vicinity of the new concrete plant location; therefore, <br />the plant will not be at risk of being buried in the event of a slope failure. <br />By phone conversation, the Division also asked that the operator/permittee re-confirm <br />reclamation to the post-mining land use of wildlife habitat and open space. There is no <br />change proposed for the reclamation plan at this time, the affected area will be returned <br />to the currently designated post-mining use of wildlife habitat in accordance with <br />applicable standards. This Technical Revision, changing the location of a facility in <br />place only during active mining, does not affect the Reclamation Plan. <br />In the December 20 Inspection Report, the Division noted the financial warranty does not <br />_ -.account-for-removal--of-the concrete- faciIity.. Pursuant to Rule 4.2.1 and its equivalent <br />- statutory authority (e.g., C.R.S. § 34-32.5-117(4)), the DRMS may at any time review the <br />financial warranty and determine that an adjustment in the bond is appropriate. The <br />operator understands that this process may be instituted for the Blue Pit warranty, based <br />on the Division's determination that backfill, demolition, and other costs have either <br />increased or were not accounted for as dictated by current warranty calculation <br />practices. The extent of concrete plant-related infrastructure and the cost of its removal <br />is being examined, as requested by the Division, but is not part of the present Technical <br />Revision request. <br />Given the current reclamation plan for the site, as wildlife habitat, no amendment or <br />revision is necessary to remove the concrete plant from the site. Therefore, the <br />Division's request for a commitment to remove the concrete plant is needed only to <br />clarify the implementation of the current reclamation plan for M-1981-207. As noted on <br />the enclosed letter from Western Slope Aggregates, the intent to remove the concrete <br />plant should now have "clear expectations for the purpose of documenting and bonding <br />the M-1981-207 permit." <br />It is our hope that this additional information and clarification will be adequate to <br />complete the requested TR in a timely manner. Please contact me at 303-274-4277, or <br />by electronic mail at aschatz(a?banksand esso.com, if any additional information is <br />necessary. <br />Sincerely, <br />BAN S AND GESSO, LLC <br />Ale chatz <br />encl: Notarized Letter from Bill Roberts, President of Western Slope Aggregates <br />cc: Carl Mount <br />Colorado Division of Reclamation, Mining, and Safety <br />1313 Sherman St., Room 215 <br />Denver, CO 80203