My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-11-24_REVISION - C1996083 (6)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1996083
>
2008-11-24_REVISION - C1996083 (6)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:38:15 PM
Creation date
12/2/2008 1:49:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996083
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
11/24/2008
Doc Name
Proposed Decision and Findings of Compliance
From
DRMS
To
Bowie Resources, LLC
Type & Sequence
PR10
Email Name
JJD
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
J. Stream Buffer Zones <br />The Division does not propose to approve surface or underground mining <br />activities within 100 feet or through a perennial stream or stream with a <br />biological community (4.05.18(1)). <br />K. Probable Hydrologic Consequences <br />BRL provided an analysis of the Probable Hydrologic Consequences to be expected as a <br />result of mining and reclamation operations at the Bowie No. 2 Mine. The analysis is <br />presented in Section 2.05.6(3)(b)(iii) of the permit application document. Possible <br />hydrologic impacts to the local surface and ground water systems are summarized below. <br />Surface water systems directly above the mine working, and within the permit area, could <br />be minimally impacted due to mine subsidence. Surface cracking resulting from <br />subsidence could occur within the ephemeral and intermittent stream channels which <br />overlie the mine; however, such impacts should be minimal and surface cracks should fill <br />with sediment relatively quickly. Actual interruption of surface flows should not be <br />significant. <br />Stock ponds located above the mine, and within the permit area, could also be impacted <br />by subsidence; however, significant impacts are unlikely, due to the approved subsidence <br />protection plan for the Bowie No. 2 Mine which should minimize subsidence beneath any <br />of the stock ponds. These stock ponds are owned by BRL. <br />The required sediment and drainage control plan for the Bowie No. 2 Mine must be <br />constructed and maintained as permitted. This system will protect all offsite areas from <br />any detrimental impacts from sediment or surface runoff originating on the mine site. <br />It is possible that offsite areas might receive discharge from such sources as underground <br />mine water, refuse pile leachate, or other mine-related activities. Such parameters as iron <br />and oil and grease are strictly regulated by point source discharge permit standards <br />(issued by the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment) limitations. <br />However, mine-related discharge may exhibit increased levels of total dissolved solids. <br />The Bowie No. 2 Mine permit document provides reasonable predictions of mine-related <br />discharge quantity and quality, specifically emphasizing possible increases in total <br />dissolved solids to the hydrologic system. The predictions indicate that any such <br />increases should not be significant, and downstream uses should not be impacted. <br />Perched groundwater, located above the mine workings and within the permit boundary, <br />could be impacted by subsidence. Specifically, subsidence could temporarily de-water <br />these zones; however, these water sources are not used, and recharge should occur over <br />time. It is also possible that the local bedrock groundwater quality could be impacted by <br />elevated total dissolved solids concentrations, as the mine fills with water following <br />mining, and as the water infiltrates to surrounding groundwater. Impacts within the <br />permit area should be minimal, due to the relative lack of useable groundwater, and due <br />to the vertical separation which exists between the D-2 coal seam, the B-2 coal seam and <br />the Rollins Sandstone located considerably below the mining elevation. Local alluvial <br />systems downgradient from the mine should not receive sufficient mine water drainage to <br />create any impacts. <br />29
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.