Laserfiche WebLink
VII - CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br />Case 1 - The resulting safety factor of 1.42 meets the SEO minimum requirement of 1.25 for an <br />embankment during construction. The resulting safety factor of 1.15 is above the SEO minimum <br />requirement of 1.0 for an embankment subject to earthquake loading. The proposed setback of <br />55 feet from the proposed permit boundary, and 25 feet from the existing Weld County Road 51 <br />right-of-way is satisfactory. <br />Case 2 - The resulting safety factor of 1.84 meets the SEO minimum requirement of 1.25 for an <br />embankment during construction. The resulting safety factor of 1.39 is above the SEO minimum <br />requirement of 1.0 for an embankment subject to earthquake loading. The proposed setback of <br />25 feet from the proposed permit boundary/fence, and 60 feet from the existing Weld County <br />Road 58 right-of-way is satisfactory. <br />Case 3 - The resulting safety factor of 1.62 meets the SEO minimum requirement of 1.25 for an <br />embankment during construction. The resulting safety factor of 1.26 is above the SEO minimum <br />requirement of 1.0 for an embankment subject to earthquake loading. The proposed setback of <br />150 feet from the existing oil/gas well is satisfactory. <br />Case 4 - The resulting safety factor of 1.42 meets the SEO minimum requirement of 1.25 for an <br />embankment during construction. The resulting safety factor of 1.11 is above the SEO minimum <br />requirement of 1.0 for an embankment subject to earthquake loading. The proposed setback of <br />150 feet from the existing oil/gas well is satisfactory. <br />Case 5 - The resulting safety factor of 1.49 meets the SEO minimum requirement of 1.25 for an <br />embankment during construction. The resulting safety factor of 1.18 is above the SEO minimum <br />requirement of 1.0 for an embankment subject to earthquake loading. The proposed setback of <br />25 feet from the access easement, and 55 feet from the property/permit boundary is <br />satisfactory. <br />Case 6 - The resulting safety factor of 1.46 meets the SEO minimum requirement of 1.25 for an <br />embankment during construction. The resulting safety factor of 1.17 is above the SEO minimum <br />requirement of 1.0 for an embankment subject to earthquake loading. The proposed setback of <br />150 feet from the existing oil/gas wells and existing tank battery is satisfactory. <br />Case 7 - The resulting safety factor of 1.26 meets the SEO minimum requirement of 1.25 for an <br />embankment during construction. The resulting safety factor of 1.06 is above the SEO minimum <br />requirement of 1.0 for an embankment subject to earthquake loading. The proposed setback of <br />25 feet from the proposed permit boundary/existing ditch bank is satisfactory. <br />Journey Ventures, LLC - Kersey Gravel Pit <br />Slope Stability Analysis <br />Page 5