My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-11-20_INSPECTION - M2008050
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Inspection
>
Minerals
>
M2008050
>
2008-11-20_INSPECTION - M2008050
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:38:08 PM
Creation date
11/25/2008 8:17:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2008050
IBM Index Class Name
INSPECTION
Doc Date
11/20/2008
Doc Name
Inspection report
From
DRMS
To
Nuvemco LLC
Inspection Date
11/18/2008
Email Name
GRM
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
(Page 2) <br />MINE ID # OR PROSPECTING ID #: M-2008-050 <br />INSPECTION DATE: 11-18-08 <br />OBSERVATIONS <br />INSPECTOR'S INITIALS GRM <br />This inspection was conducted as part of the normal monitoring program established by the Colorado Division of <br />Reclamation, Mining and Safety for permitted sites. Designated Mining Operations (DMO) require quarterly <br />inspections for which this is the first since operations began. The October Mine Ore Stockpile is a reclamation <br />project located south of John Brown Canyon above Gateway, Colorado. The 0.46 acre project is the removal of <br />approximately 7,500 tons of pre-law ore stockpile that was left in place and uncapped. Nuvemco proposed the <br />removal of the ore stockpile and reclamation of the stockpile area. Mick and Sue Carter, representatives for <br />Nuvemco met DRMS inspector Russ Means on site for the inspection. BLM representative Scott Gerwe <br />accompanied the inspector on site as well. <br />Due to some unforeseen issues with the shipping destination the planned removal of the ore stockpile was not <br />completed as originally planned. The Carters noted that no definitive information is available as to when the ore pile <br />will be removed. Current disturbance is noted as a small area on the west side of the pile where approximately 3 <br />truck loads of material were removed off site. Also the disturbance includes the turn around area for the trucks <br />which had topsoil pushed back into a berm. Total disturbance to the area is approximately a quarter to half acre. <br />Due to the fact that it appears no shipping will occur over the winter the inspector and BLM representative reviewed <br />the site to ensure that stormwater and erosion issues are addressed to prevent off site impacts. <br />Signage was not in place per Rule 3.1.12 (1). 3.1.12 (1) states a sign shall be placed at the entrance to the mine <br />which shall be clearly visible from the access road. The sign shall state (a) the name of the operator, (b) a statement <br />that a reclamation permit for the operation has been issued by the Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Board, and (c) <br />the permit number. The lack of proper signage has been noted as an issue of concern not a problem. If the signage <br />is not posted by the next quarterly inspection the inspector may change it to a problem with a specific date for <br />correction. Please take the time to correct this issue before it becomes a problem. <br />The ore pile sits on a relatively flat bench with drainages adjacent to but not in the permit area. Relatively simple <br />stormwater measures have been employed to prevent sedimentation from impacting the drainages. However, because <br />of the winter shut down some additional work will be required. Berms around the immediate excavation point using <br />available material should prevent any storm run on or run off from the area. The excavation creates a sedimentation <br />pond that should hold any precipitation that falls on the disturbance area. A temporary bar ditch at the site entrance <br />should also deflect any run on from the site towards the natural drainage. Also, cutting in a ditch along the western <br />side of the access road within the disturbance area will help prevent any run on into the excavation area. It is noted <br />that silt fencing has been deployed around the perimeter of the stockpile area. The silt fencing has had limited <br />success due to the shallow overburden before hitting bedrock. Nuvemco will need to employ a better method of silt <br />control around the pile. The inspector suggests using excelsior rolls or hay bales instead of the fencing. It is <br />important to note that these are suggestions but it is ultimately the operator's responsibility to develop and employ <br />an effective barrier. None of these measures meet the requirements of engineering review by the Division for <br />handling specific precipitation and flow events as required under DMO regulations but given the nature of the <br />project shoukymight be adequate. The suggestions are for temporary winter closure purposes only. The operator <br />will be responsible for any impacts or off site damage so Nuvemco should be mindful of this when planning and <br />implementing any control measures. The lack of proper stormwater and sedimentation control around the ore pile is <br />noted as aproblem with specific dates for correction at the end of this report.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.