Laserfiche WebLink
New Horizon Mine TR-57 <br />3rd Adequacy Review <br />18-Nov-2008 <br />Page 3 of 3 <br />showed high results". The reference to (e)-1 appears to be a typographical error; <br />should be (d)-1. On amended Attachment page 2.05.4(2)(d)-1-18, the narrative <br />references lab results on amended Attachment pages ...(d)-1-19 and ...(d)-1-20, and <br />states that the remediation samples demonstrate acceptable saturated paste <br />conductivity levels. Unfortunately, there appears to have been some type of copying <br />error, such that only one page of a two page soil analytical report was provided, and <br />the page provided did not include conductivity results (to verify the narrative <br />conclusion). <br />Please correct the typographical error on amended narrative page ...(d)-35, and <br />please provide both pages of the two page August 2008 soil analytical report for <br />inclusion in Attachment ...(d)-1, to demonstrate acceptable saturated paste <br />conductivity levels in the immediate vicinity of Sample Site #32. <br />39. The Division noted that the Section 2.05.4(2)(d) table of contents listed a sub-section <br />titled ."Prime Farmland Revegetation Success Standards", however no such section <br />was included in the amended narrative. The Division further noted that Attachment <br />2.05.4(2)(d)-1 was erroneously listed twice in the section table of contents. <br />Clarification and appropriate amendment was requested. <br />The operator opted to address the Prime Farmland Revegetation Success Standards <br />issues within the forthcoming Permit Revision Application. The section table of <br />contents was properly amended to reflect deletion of the subsection, and the <br />erroneous'additional reference to Attachment ...(d)-1 was properly deleted. Item <br />Resolved. <br />40. (New Item) In the cover letter response to this review, please include (in <br />addition to the item specific response) a summary description of any changes <br />(and justification for same) made subsequent to the July version of the Soil <br />Resource or Topsoil (Redistribution) sections of the application that were not in <br />response to Division adequacy review requests. <br />This concludes the Division's Third Adequacy Review for New Horizon Mine (Permit No. <br />C-1981-008) Technical Revision No. 57 - Soil Resource Information, Soil Handling, and <br />Prime Farmland. Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions that may arise. <br />Sincerely, <br /> <br />Marcia L. Talvitie, P.E. <br />Environmental Protection Specialist <br />xc: Greg Lewicki & Associates <br />DRMS File