My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-06-09_REVISION - C1980007 (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1980007
>
2008-06-09_REVISION - C1980007 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:32:40 PM
Creation date
11/20/2008 12:54:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
6/9/2008
Doc Name
Revised Pages Part 2
Type & Sequence
TR111
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
154
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~~ <br />Chapter 3 <br />activities would occur during the project from <br />all systems including: vertical. (MDWs), <br />horizontal, and main mine fans. Methane is <br />over 20 times more effective in trapping heat in <br />the atmosphere than COZ over a 100-year <br />period. Methane; emissions, from an air permit <br />perspective, are not regulated by the State of <br />Colorado. Preliminary modeling results using <br />EPA's SCREEN3 air model indicate that <br />methane concentrations from the methane <br />drainage wells would result in an increase of <br />breathing zone methane concentrations in air to <br />one tenth of one percent (0.1 %) by volume, at a <br />distance of 50 meters from the source. This is <br />below the 1Vline Safety and Health <br />Administration (MSHA) level of one percent. <br />Quarterly reporting of methane emissions to <br />BLM is considered confidential information <br />and cannot be released by the Forest Service. <br />However, the values used to estimate methane <br />emissions included in the analysis were based <br />on values associated with a 5 year average. As <br />mining in the B Seam is completed, E seam <br />coal will replace those values with the lower <br />levels indicated below. <br />To assess the contribution to greenhouse gasses <br />the following assumptions were used: <br />• Based on a Gas-In-Place Study that MCC <br />had completed in 2006 by Slumberger, the <br />E Seam methane is anticipated to be 50 to <br />60 percent of that in the B seam. <br />• Using official data provided to BLM by <br />MCC for the B seam releases of methane, <br />all systems vertical (MDWs), horizontal, <br />and main mine fans released an average of <br />13 to 17 million cubic feet per day of <br />methane. <br />• Horizontal systems are no longer used and <br />are not expected to be used in the future. <br />This reduces the releases by 2 million <br />cubic feet per day associated with <br />horizontal drainage, leaving an average of <br />11 to 15 million cubic feet per day to <br />represent current conditions of the B seam. <br />For the following calculations, the middle <br />(13 million cubic feet per day} will be <br />used. <br />Using the above assumptions, the following <br />conclusions can be made: <br />As stated earlier, E seam methane is estimated <br />to be 50 to 60 percent of the B seam average <br />(13 million cubic feet per day), which amounts <br />to 6.5 to 7.8 million cubic feet per day, or 2.4 to <br />2.8 billion cubic feet per year. <br />In order to calculate the contribution of the <br />project to overall greenhouse gas emissions, <br />this predicted methane release was converted to <br />"CO2 equivalent". This conversion results in <br />approximately 960,960 to 1,131,200 metric <br />tons (tonnes) of COZ equivalent released to the <br />atmosphere per year by the proposed action. <br />Based on potential COZ equivalent emissions <br />calculated above, the proposed action would <br />increase potential greenhouse gas emissions in <br />Colorado from fossil fuel combustion by <br />approximately 1.3 percent (calculated as CO2 <br />equivalent). It should be noted that this <br />percentage increase considers only emissions <br />from fossil fuel combustion and the percentage <br />would decrease if other sources of greenhouse <br />gases (e.g., landfill gas, oil and natural gas <br />operations, wastewater treatment, and ruminant <br />livestock, etc.) were included in the calculation. <br />Additionally, this calculation considers only <br />emissions from fossil fuel combustion in <br />Colorado, and not the US (as coal mine <br />methane in the US accounts for approximately <br />5.5 percent of methane released) or worldwide <br />emissions of all greenhouse gases (including <br />water vapor which is the largest contributor to <br />the "greenhouse effect" and comprises <br />approximately 95 percent of all greenhouse <br />gases) that theoretically affect global warming. <br />It is not possible to estimate or calculate the <br />effect that methane emissions from this project <br />would have on global wainling. The CEQ <br />regulations for implementing NEPA at 40 CFR <br />1502.22 discuss evaluating reasonably <br />• <br />• <br />~_~ <br />;7 <br />60 Deer Creek Ventilation Shaft and E Seain Methane Drainage Wells FEIS <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.