My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-03-27_REVISION - C1980007
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1980007
>
2008-03-27_REVISION - C1980007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:26:15 PM
Creation date
11/20/2008 11:51:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
3/27/2008
Doc Name
Adequacy Response Letter
From
MCC
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
TR111
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
,MOUNTAIN COAL <br />• (WANY L.L.C. <br />A Subsidiary of Arch Westem Resources, LLC <br />MIR <br />piv?s??" u? "ec?ama?• <br />Nlinin8 SOW <br />March 24, 2008 and <br />Mr. Tom Kaldenbach <br />Colorado Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />West Elk Mine <br />P O Box 591 <br />5174 Highway 133 <br />Somerset, CO 81434 <br />(970) 929-5015 <br />Fax (970) 929-5595 <br />Subject: Mountain Coal Comapany L.L.C., West Elk Mine, Permit No. C-80-007, Technical <br />Revision No. 111, E 1 Panel, E Seam Methane Drainage Wells (MDWs) Project Plan, Federal <br />Lease C-1362, Adequacy Responses. <br />Dear Mr. Kaldenbach: <br />MCC is submitting the attached responses to the Division's adequacy comments received November <br />• 15, 2008. The Division's comments are italicized and MCC's responses are bolded. <br />1. The right-of-entry requirement (2.03.6(1)) will be satisfied upon implementation of the USES <br />decision to approve the proposed work, as set forth in their decision issued November 8, 2007 <br />regarding the EIS titled "Deer Creek Shaft and E Seam Methane Drainage Wells Project <br />which is subject to an appeal period. <br />MCC is aware of the appeal period. <br />2. Please add to the submittal a print-011t of the input and output data that were used for <br />generating the profile of the slope stability analysis for the well pad. <br />MCC initially completed the input and output data for TR-101, and includes the <br />information with the attached TR-111 Responses. <br />3. The revision in which exact well and road locations will be identified may need to be a <br />Technical (rather than Minor) Revision, depending on road and pad designs. <br />MCC with USFS personnel may need to field-fit some of the low-volume roads (USFS) <br />within the corridors assigned. <br />4. Please resolve the following comments that DRMS received from the USFS. <br />a) On page 7, under Proposed Low-volume Road and In regress, MCC should recognize <br />that except for mobilization/demobilization of the drill rig, low-boy for heavy equipment, and <br />other large equipment, all project traffic (including contractor traffic) will be utilizing the <br />Sylvester Gulch Road.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.