My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-11-18_REVISION - M1999098
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1999098
>
2008-11-18_REVISION - M1999098
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 2:18:26 PM
Creation date
11/19/2008 9:27:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1999098
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
11/18/2008
Doc Name
Preliminary Adequacy Review
From
DRMS
To
Resource Conservation Partners, LLC.
Type & Sequence
AM1
Email Name
ECS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
6.4.8 EXHIBIT H - Wildlife Information <br />This section is adequate as submitted. <br />6.4.9 EXHIBIT I - Soils Information <br />This section is adequate as submitted. <br />6.4.10 EXHIBIT J - Vegetation Information <br />This section is adequate as submitted. <br />6.4.11 EXHIBIT K - Climate Information <br />This section is adequate as submitted. <br />6.4.12 EXHIBIT L - Reclamation Costs <br />The reclamation plan costs provided in this application are incomplete and a bit <br />confusing. The biggest omission is that no actual breakdown of specific tasks or costs <br />has been provided. Also the text of this section states that the area is within the existing <br />permit area, is currently bonded, and no additional bonding would be required. This <br />statement seems to be a bit contradictory with the amendment application. Perhaps what <br />is being implied here is a phased bonding approach with a total on-site disturbance of no <br />more than 53 acres? Please clarify. <br />Aggregate Industries needs to prepare a bond estimate broken down by task and cost for <br />each task of reclamation at the projected time of the maximum disturbance of the site. <br />This estimate will be reviewed by DRMS once the remaining adequacy issues such as <br />maximum amount of backfill to be placed; total acres requiring topsoil replacement and <br />seeding, and all other tasks for the projected maximum disturbance have been clarified. <br />Also, it appears that no costs for several listed features, such as the proposed underpass to <br />Cell 4, or for removal of the conveyors, etc., have been included in the list of tasks <br />submitted. DRMS will review the reclamation cost estimate provided, and if necessary <br />prepare an estimate itself, if the provided estimate appears to be incomplete or <br />inadequate. <br />6.4.13 EXHIBIT M - Other Permits and Licenses <br />This section is adequate as submitted. <br />6.4.14 EXHIBIT N - Source of Legal Right to Enter <br />This section is adequate as submitted.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.