My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-11-10_INSPECTION - M1988090
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Inspection
>
Minerals
>
M1988090
>
2008-11-10_INSPECTION - M1988090
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:37:50 PM
Creation date
11/11/2008 11:31:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1988090
IBM Index Class Name
INSPECTION
Doc Date
11/10/2008
Doc Name
Insp Rpt
From
DRMS
To
TWK Enterprises
Inspection Date
11/6/2008
Email Name
JLE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINE ID # OR PROSPECTING ID #: - M-19AA-n9n <br />INSPECTION DATE: 11-7-2008 INSPECTOR=S INITIALS: 11 F <br />OBSERVATIONS <br />This was a monitoring inspection of the Deer Trail Pit, DRMS file number M-1988-090. This site is located <br />approximately 1 mile southwest of the town of Deer Trail, Colorado in Arapahoe County. I, Jared Ebert of the <br />Colorado Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety conducted the inspection. No one from the operation <br />was present during the inspection. <br />On April 24t", 2008 and inspection was conducted by Deb Zack and myself at this same site. During that <br />inspection there were five problems noted. This inspection was conducted to monitor the progress of correcting <br />the problems noted during the April inspection report. There were five corrective actions noted during the April <br />inspection, they are subsequently listed below with their current status explained. <br />1.) Mine entrance sign and permit boundary marker were not clearly posted per Rule 3.1.12 (2) and Rule <br />3.1.12 (2) (1) (c) which requires the operator to clearly label the mine entrance and the permit boundary. <br />The mine entrance sign was posted at the time of the inspection (see Figure 1). Upon entering the site, <br />an attempt was made to locate any remaining permit boundary markers. Four boundary markers were <br />observed in their approximate location. However, the two markers that delineate the eastern boundary <br />line were not in place. There was a fence that runs along where the eastern boundary line should be <br />located, but it is unclear where the north east corner marker should be located. The boundaries still <br />need to be clearly delineated <br />2.) Improper storage and containment of fuels and/or other hazardous materials was found on site. <br />Upon inspection of the site, it seemed that all the storage containers have been removed from the site, <br />none were found at the time of the inspection. This issue appears to have been resolved. <br />3.) The range of debris on the mine site such as concrete, tires, rusted metal, and old appliances <br />stockpiled on the mine site must be removed per C.R.S. 34-32.5-116 (4) (e) which states that "all refuse <br />shall be disposed of in a manner that controls unsightliness or the deleterious affects of such refuse." <br />Upon inspection of the site, it seems that the refuse have been removed from the site. This issue appears <br />to have been resolved. <br />4.) Russian olive was observed in several small sections in the pit. <br />Based on the boundary markers that were found on the site it does not appear that the Russian Olive <br />trees that were noted during the April Inspection are contained in the permit boundary. This no longer <br />appears to be an issue at this time. <br />5.) Ground water appears to have been exposed on the site without prior approval by the Office of the <br />State Engineer and submittal of an approved substitute water supply plan. No mention of groundwater <br />exposure was made in the approved reclamation plan. <br />2
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.