Laserfiche WebLink
that the table which apparently should have been referenced was Table <br />2.05.4(2)(d)-4. <br />In the amended Section 2.05.4(2)(d), the narrative reference was not changed, <br />although some of the table numbering was changed, and there appear to be a <br />number of additional table number referencing errors in the amended text. We <br />note the following apparent errors with respect to narrative references to tables in <br />the section. <br />• At the top of amended page (d)-22, the reference to Table (d)-3 appears to <br />be incorrect; correct reference would appear to be Table (d)-5. <br />• In the last paragraph of amended page (d)-24, the reference to Table (d) <br />appears to be incorrect; correct reference would appear to be Table (d)-2. <br />Also, we note an apparent error on amended Table (d)-2. "West Side of 27 <br />Road" listing in the bottom right comer of the table is erroneous, as the <br />corresponding volume reflects the total topsoil stockpile volume for both <br />the east side and west side of 27 Road. <br />• In the second paragraph on amended page (d)-26, the reference to Table <br />(d)-3 appears to be incorrect; proper reference would appear to be Table <br />(d)-6. <br />• In the first paragraph on amended page (d)-33, the Table (d)-3 reference to <br />14,731 cy soil excavation from Pond 13 disturbance appears to be in error; <br />proper reference would appear to be Table (d)-2. <br />Please address these apparent errors and amend the text and table(s) as <br />warranted. <br />34. In the initial adequacy review, the Division identified a concern regarding EC and <br />pH data reported in Attachment 2.05.4(2)(d)-1; specifically "second round" <br />sampling data for the two parameters was based on 1:1 soil:water extract, rather <br />than the permit specified saturated paste extract. The Division made the <br />following request. <br />Please provide lab sheets with saturated paste extract based pH and EC <br />values for all of the samples collected from the 2.5 acre grid. If the lab did <br />not provide Saturated Paste Extract pH and EC analyses for the subject <br />samples, re-sampling of the grid will be required. For any sample sites that <br />exceed the criteria based on saturated paste extract values, the more <br />intensive sampling investigation and mitigation protocol specified in the <br />final paragraph ofpage 2.05.4(2)(d)-28 will be required. <br />In response to this concern, the operator's consultant, Walsh Engineering, <br />conducted additional investigation including literature search into the relationship <br />between 1:1 and saturated paste. extract conductivity values, re-sampling of 8 <br />subsoil sample locations for conductivity analysis using saturated paste extract, <br />and discussion regarding interpretation of the results of re-sampling with Dave <br />4