My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-09-18_REVISION - M1978091UG
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1978091
>
2008-09-18_REVISION - M1978091UG
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 5:39:01 PM
Creation date
9/22/2008 4:20:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1978091UG
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
9/18/2008
Doc Name
Response to adequacy review letter
From
Gault Group, INc.
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM3
Email Name
RCO
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RESPONSE: The BLM received a complete copy of the initial Amendment package. <br />Additional correspondence requesting BLM review of the seed mix was obtained <br />by Karmen King/GGI from Dave Lazorchak/BLM (EMAIL correspondence <br />received Friday, September 5'h) indicating that the seed mix was sufficient by <br />BLM standards, but may need to be revisited at a later date when reclamation <br />begins. Changes were made to appropriate portions of Exhibit D to reflect the <br />BLM approval of the seed mix. <br />Item 8: First entry, Page 2. <br />"What are to be the maximum gradients of reclaimed slopes that are backji'lled or <br />reduced by cutting? " <br />RESPONSE: This information was highlighted within the reclamation figures and <br />identify the anticipated slope to be 2:1. This gradient matches the adjacent <br />topography and will therefore achieve BLM's visual aesthetic goals for disturbed <br />ground. For instance; the following slopes were calculated using the survey <br />points gathered by BCH LLC; as follows; <br />• The slope above the highwall/portal ascents 30' vertical over 45' horizontal; <br />thereby lending a slope of 1.5:1. <br />• The Face of the waste rock slope contains a slope of 1.3 - 1.5:1. <br />• The natural slope to the North of the Level 6 pad is 1.7:1. <br />• The `swale' to the North of the pad, adjacent to the waste rock slope is 1.88:1. <br />• The existing Deadman Gulch fault pathway above the Level 6 pad is 2.89:1. <br />Therefore, the recommended 2:1 slolre is `gentler' than the adjacent surroundings. This <br />was used to accommodate for heavy equipment needs as well as for reseeding success. <br />The slopes will be achieved by compaction and grading of materials as it is placed atop <br />the retained Level 6 pad. <br />Item 9: Second entry, Page 3. <br />"Please describe the methods, to be used for closure or safeguarding used in the <br />final reclamation of each portal. " <br />RESPONSE: These methods were described within the `portal closure' portion of <br />Exhibit D - the reclamation plan. A summary of the proposed closure strategy is as <br />follows; <br />• The Level 3 portal occurs within patented ground. The land owner wishes to <br />retain the ability to access the portal into the future. As a result, the portal will <br />retain its current steel-door, and lock system which does not allow for anyone to <br />tamper with the door. This should assure public safety associated with the portal <br />well into the future. <br />• The Level 6 portal will be reclaimed at the termination of all mining activity with <br />the use of a polyurethane foam plug since the portal has a demonstrated history of <br />being dry. Since mining activities in the future will be accomplished in much the <br />same way as they have in the past, it is reasonable to assume that water will be <br />Page 4 of 9
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.