Laserfiche WebLink
West Elk Mine <br />In summary, the West Elk Mine site can be characterized as having decreasing penneability with <br />depth as a result of lithologic changes and smaller fracture aperture, limiting downward percolation <br />of groundwater through the bedrock units, and resulting in localized discharge via springs generally <br />above the F Seam. The exceptions are the damaged zones associated with fault systems <br />encountered in the eastern portion of the mine as described above. Additional discussion of these <br />fault-related inflows can be found in Section 2.05.6. <br />Groundwater Quality Characteristics <br />MCC has selected the water quality parameters listed in Table 7 for baseline laboratory <br />analysis to characterize baseline and ongoing groundwater quality. These include iron and <br />manganese, because the detection of these elements (or changes in their observed <br />concentrations) may represent conditions in which metals are mobilized. Additionally, <br />changes in conductivity and TDS can indicate changes in water quality that need to be further <br />investigated. As a result, monitoring of these selected parameters provides a detection system <br />for mining-induced changes in water quality. Therefore, once full-suite analyses have been <br />collected at a site for at least five years, these indicator parameters (pH, conductivity, TDS, <br />and iron) will be collected on an annual basis. <br />Analyses are completed as outlined in the Guidelines for Collection of Baseline Water Quality <br />and Overburden Geochemistry Data (CDMG, 1982). Results are reported in the Annual <br />Hydrology Reports (AHR). If not already provided in AHR's, baseline data will be provided <br />. to CDMG prior to longwall mining under or within the angle-of-draw of a monitored water <br />resource. <br />Regional Groundwater Ouality <br />Data collected on groundwater quality from representative wells within the permit area are <br />summarized in Table 7. As this table shows, the highest average levels of TDS are in well <br />SOM-311 as completed in the B Seam coals. This is consistent with the elevated TDS <br />concentrations in other B Seam wells such as SOM-129-H and JMB-12. The highest average <br />total and dissolved iron concentrations occur in wells SOM-311 and SOM-3E. These wells also <br />produce the highest average manganese values as well. The water chemistry results from <br />these two wells demonstrate a striking similarity between the B and E Seams. This is <br />consistent with the geologic (depositional and lithologic) similarities noted in Section 2.04.6 <br />(Geology Description). The relatively high levels of iron in groundwater (Table 7) are <br />consistent with the levels found in surface water (Table 19) and indicate some groundwater <br />discharge to the streams and a similarity in terms of geology. <br />The only applicable water quality standards for the parameters monitored are secondary <br />drinking water standards. Comparison of these standards to groundwater quality data <br />show numerous dissolved iron exceedances and routine pH levels above 8.5 in three <br />groundwater wells (SOM-38-H-1, SOM-2, and SOM-16). However, the causes of elevated <br />levels of these parameters are natural and not due to mining activities. <br />0 <br />2.04-74 Revised June 200.1 PRIG, Mach 2006; Rev. Apri12006 PRIO, Sep. 2007PR12