My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-09-17_REVISION - M1980244 (28)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1980244
>
2008-09-17_REVISION - M1980244 (28)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 5:52:18 PM
Creation date
9/19/2008 7:43:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980244
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
9/17/2008
Doc Name
Response to Adequacy Review
From
CC&V
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM9
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
as requested. In addition the City of Victor is missing from this map. Please include when <br />• the map is re-submitted. <br />Response: <br />A revised drawing C-4a is enclosed as Attachment 3. A legend has been added to describe to <br />colored hatching associated with this drawing. These hatchings identify a classification <br />change in area of disturbance from that which was approved as Amendment No. 8. The <br />amended drawing also includes the identification of the Permit Boundary and the City of <br />Victor in the lower right corner. <br />D. On drawing C-5 (conceptual mining phases) the only alternative overburden storage area <br />expansion is expected to occur in the Squaw Gulch overburden storage area. What about <br />the East Cresson overburden storage area? <br />Response: <br />The ECOSA is being presented as a new facility that is an expansion of the East Cresson <br />Backfill in the Altman portion of that mining area. The ECOSA is currently anticipated to <br />be constructed in the years 2011, 2012, and 2013 as highlighted by the blue colors on <br />Drawing C5. This sequence is also presented in Table 5-3 on Page 5-5 of the Project <br />Description. The SGOSAE is the only alternative area identified as part of the MLE Project <br />for overburden placement, should it be required. <br />• E. Please provide all the information on all the maps, including elevation & contour intervals <br />as submitted in Drawing F-1, labeled as Approximate Post Mining Topography Maps. <br />Some of the maps submitted with the application even lacked a legend. CC&V must make <br />it easy for the Division and the public to view the application and supporting maps without <br />going back and forth to other maps to verify the accuracy of the information provided <br />throughout the application. <br />Response: <br />Drawing B-1: The Legend is included for this drawing and CC&V feels that Elevation <br />Numbers and Contour Lines are not needed on this drawing as the purpose of this drawing is <br />to identify the general area of the project. <br />Drawing C-1: The Legend is included and CC&V feels that Elevation Numbers and <br />Contour Lines are not needed on this drawing, as the purpose of this drawing is to identify <br />the general location of adjacent land owners and permanent man made structures within 200 <br />feet of the MLE permit boundary. <br />Drawing C-1a: The Legend is included and CC&V feels that Elevation Numbers and <br />Contour Lines are not needed on this drawing, as the purpose of this drawing is to identify <br />the general location of adjacent land owners and permanent man made structures within 200 <br />• feet within the Victor City Limits of the MLE permit boundary. <br />Drawing C-2: The Legend, Elevation Numbers and Contour Lines are included as the <br />drawing as submitted in the MLE Project Application. The Contour Intervals for the surface <br />5
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.