My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-09-17_HYDROLOGY - M2002004
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Hydrology
>
Minerals
>
M2002004
>
2008-09-17_HYDROLOGY - M2002004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:36:18 PM
Creation date
9/17/2008 1:39:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2002004
IBM Index Class Name
HYDROLOGY
Doc Date
9/17/2008
Doc Name
2nd Quarter, 2008 Groundwater Monitoring Report
From
GCC Rio Grande, Inc.
To
DRMS
Permit Index Doc Type
Hydrology Report
Email Name
BMK
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
81
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
0 <br />0 <br />0© <br />Client Project ID: <br />Lab Order: 08-4900 CASE NARRATIVE <br />this analyte is within limits and the laboratory control spike (LCS) recoveries are within QC limits, <br />showing the analysis is in control. There are no other anomalies to report. WIC M <br />RADIOCHEMISTRY <br />These tests are not yet complete ; results will be reported as soon as they are received from Hazen <br />Research. CMS <br />Results were reported on 8/14/08. CMS <br />ADDENDUM 8122108 <br />As requested, Anion/ Cation Balances were calculated for all samples. <br />The balances on 08-4900-01 and 08-4900-04 showed poor closures due to elevated results on the <br />alkalinity tests. Those elevated levels were caused by doing that test on "as received" samples rather <br />than on filtered samples. The high suspended solids in those samples were partially dissolved as the pH <br />became more acidic during the alkalinity titration, consuming acid and. giving high results. <br />The alkalinity results are estimated to be 2 X higher than if the analyses were done on filtered samples. <br />This was estimated by comparing the measured TDS and the calculated TDS (sum of the anions and <br />cations). Correcting for this extra alkalinity, the Ion Balance closures would be 4.58 % difference (08- <br />4900-01) and 3.00 % difference (084900-04). <br />The Ion Balances on the other samples were acceptable, and the measured and calculated TDS values <br />agreed well for those samples. <br />6,6?L " <br />Carl Smits, Technical Director, Evergreen Analytical, Inc <br />Print Date: 8/222108
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.