My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-08-25_REVISION - C1992080
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1992080
>
2008-08-25_REVISION - C1992080
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:35:48 PM
Creation date
9/16/2008 3:22:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1992080
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
8/25/2008
Doc Name
Operator Comments
From
Savage and Savage
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
RN3
Email Name
TAK
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Tom <br />-----Original Message----- <br />From: Kaldenbach, Tom <br />Sent: Monday, August 18, 2008 4:39 PM <br />To: 'savageandsavage@earthlink.net' <br />Subject: RE: Carbon Junction Renewal Reclamation Bond Recalculation <br />Mike, <br />Dan and I are in the office this week Mon-Thurs (Aug 18-21). <br />After Aug 21, the next day that Dan and I will both be in the office will be September 15. <br />Would a conference call this week work for you? <br />Tom <br />-----Original Message----- <br />From: savageandsavage@earthlink.net [mailto:savageandsavage@earthlink.net] <br />Sent: Monday, August 18, 2008 8:19 AM <br />To: Kaldenbach, Tom <br />Subject: RE: Carbon Junction Renewal Reclamation Bond Recalculation <br />Tom, <br />I am out of the office this week but would like to set up a meeting with you and Dan next <br />week (Tues, Wed, or Thurs works for me). Would you e-mail me back with the day and time. <br />Thanks, <br />Mike Savage <br />-----Original Message----- <br />>From: "Kaldenbach, Tom" <Tom.Kaldenbach@state.co.us> <br />>Sent: Aug 14, 2008 12:14 PM <br />>To: savageandsavage@earthlink.net <br />>Subject: RE: Carbon Junction Renewal Reclamation Bond Recalculation <br />>Mike, <br />>It would be best to meet and discuss the questions. Give me or Dan a <br />>call. <br />>Tom <br />>-----Original Message----- <br />>From: savageandsavage@earthlink.net <br />>[mailto:savageandsavage@earthlink.net] <br />>Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2008 11:13 AM <br />>To: Kaldenbach, Tom <br />>Cc: PAUTSKY@aol.com <br />>Subject: Carbon Junction Renewal Reclamation Bond Recalculation <br />>Tom, <br />>I started reviewing the revised reclamation bond calculation for the <br />>Carbon Junction Mine renewal and and your observations and need a <br />>couple clarifications. <br />>Does the Division now agree that the topsoil in Topsoil Stockpiles #4 <br />>and #7 is excess, that the stockpiles may remain in place and <br />>re-distribution from these piles will not be required to satisfy the <br />>reclamation plan? <br />>If Oakridge Energy submits a technical revision addressing these <br />>topsoil stockpiles, what exactly would be needed to be addressed in the <br />>permit document text, and what documentation would be required to <br />2
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.