My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-05-13_REVISION - C1981008 (5)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981008
>
2008-05-13_REVISION - C1981008 (5)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:31:32 PM
Creation date
5/14/2008 10:12:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981008
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
5/13/2008
Doc Name
Bond Release Application
From
Greg Lewicki and Associates
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
SL11
Email Name
MLT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
85
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
New Horizon Mine: 2007 Vegetation Sampling for Phase 2 Bond Release <br />• 4. Dryland Pasture Reference Area (6.7 acres). This area is vacant unmanaged and adjacent <br />to the Nucla Airport. The reference area was established several years ago and the <br />vegetation was measured in summer 2005 for comparisons with other New Horizon Mine <br />Permit 1 reclaimed lands. <br />5. Dryland Pasture Reclaimed, Phase 3 (21.9 acres). This area is in its first year of eligibility <br />for Phase 3 vegetation measurement. WFC is also applying for Phase 2 bond release on <br />this area. <br />6. Dryland Pasture Reclaimed, Phase 2 (59.4 acres). This area includes the Phase 3 Dryland <br />Pasture reclaimed lands described above, and additional reclaimed lands eligible for Phase <br />2 measurement but not yet eligible for Phase 3 measurement. <br />2.2 Sampling Procedures <br />A field crew of 3 to 4 botanists conducted fieldwork from June 4 to June 22, 2007. For each of <br />the 6 study areas described above, in ESRI ArcMap (a GIS computer application) we created a <br />polygon shapefile defining the study area boundary, then used a GIS application to generate at <br />least 50 random point locations in each study area. We uploaded the sample points into <br />Garmin GPS units (average accuracy 15 feet) and used the GPS units to navigate to sample <br />points in the field. A few sample points were rejected in the field because they fell in areas at <br />field margins not typical of the reclaimed land or reference area land being measured, for <br />example a mowed road berm. <br />• Cover was measured by a point intercept method. From random sample points, a 100 ft. tape <br />was stretched at a bearing of magnetic north (if a bearing caused the tape to cross the study <br />area boundary, then bearings of east, south, or west were substituted, in that order). At 10 foot <br />intervals along the tape beginning at 10 feet, a point frame was positioned perpendicular to the <br />tape and extending to the left. The point frame consists of a metal bar with tripod legs, <br />positioned parallel to the ground about 1 meter high. A sliding laser light pointer is positioned at <br />each of 10 marked points along the bar spaced 10 cm apart. At each point the observers record <br />the object that first intersects the downward-pointed laser light (plant species, litter, rock, or bare <br />ground). Ten cover readings at each of 10 intervals along the transect yield 100 cover readings <br />per transect, which are tallied and the total number of hits per species or object is equal to the <br />percent cover estimate for that transect. <br />Production was measured by clipping and weighing current year above-ground herbaceous <br />growth within a square 0.25 m2 frame (irrigated pasture) or a rectangular 2 m2 frame (dryland <br />pasture). Clippings were segregated into paper bags by perennial grass, annual grass, <br />perennial forb, annual forb, noxious weed, and a few individual species (such as broom <br />snakeweed on the dryland pasture reference area, pending decisions on how to group plant <br />species for analysis). Bags were oven-dried at 90 degrees C to a constant weight, then the <br />contents weighed on a calibrated electronic balance to the nearest 0.1 g. <br />For both cover and production, samples were taken in each study area until either sample <br />adequacy was reached (see statistical procedures, below) or a minimum of 15 to 30 samples <br />was reached, depending on the statistical methods. Sample adequacy was calculated <br />• periodically in the field during sampling by entering cover data and fresh weight production data <br />into a field laptop computer. After production samples were dried, sample adequacy was <br />BIO-Logic Environmental 6 <br />November 12, 2007 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.