My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-04-15_REVISION - M1980244 (202)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1980244
>
2008-04-15_REVISION - M1980244 (202)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 5:52:04 PM
Creation date
5/8/2008 1:07:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980244
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
4/15/2008
Doc Name
VOL V APP 8 Appendix B.6.2 Phase IV Interface Shear Strength Testing
From
CC & V
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM9
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
C~ <br />c2000 GcoS~mtec Consultanu <br />2.3 Geosvnthetic and Soil Materials <br />The geosynthetic and soil materials used in the testing program aze presented in <br />Appendix A. The geomembrane materials were provided to GeoSyntec by CC&V. The <br />three site soils were obtained from the project site b}~ CC&V and delivered directly to <br />GeoSyntec for testing. <br />2.4 Test Confi uration and Procedures for Interface Direct Shear Tests <br />The configuration of the test specimens and the specific test procedures used to <br />conduct each of the interface direct shear tests are presented in Appendix B. GeoSyntec <br />understands that the test procedures and test conditions were selected by Mr. Mandziak <br />of CC&V to model anticipated field conditions. <br />3. TEST RESULTS <br />~ 3.1 Failure Modes <br />For Test Series 1, sheaz failure (sliding) occurred between the drain cover fill and <br />the geomembrane. For Test Series 2 and 3, sliding occurred between the clay borrow <br />soil liner (SLC-4) and the textured side of the geomen:brane. <br />3.2 Data Presentation <br />For each of the interface direct shear tests, the total-stress shearing resistance was <br />evaluated for each applied normal stress. The test data were plotted on a graph of sheaz <br />force versus horizontal displacement. The resulting plots are presented in Appendix C. <br />The peak value of sheaz force was used to calculate the peak sheaz strength. The lazge <br />displacement shear strength (tL) was calculated by using the sheaz force measured at the <br />end of each test. No azea correction was used when computing normal and shear <br />stresses because each test was performed using a constant effective sample azea {i.e., the <br />azea of the lower sheaz box was larger than that of the upper sheaz box}. <br />The calculated sheaz strengths aze plotted on a graph of sheaz stress versus normal <br />stress. The resuhs were used to evaluate totalstress peak and large displacement sheaz <br />strength envelopes. A straight line was drawn from the origin through the data points <br />~ GLI1126lSGI00011.1)OC 2 00.02.25 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.