Laserfiche WebLink
16 Main project area hydrologic conditions <br />3.8 Squaw Gulch <br />Current Conditions <br />The Squaw Gulch drainage and the MLE permit boundary are shown on Figure 3.1. <br />Squaw Gulch is asouthwest-oriented, ephemeral drainage that crosses the diatreme- <br />granite boundary. Squaw Gulch drains into Cripple Creek approximately 4,700 feet <br />southwest of where Highway 67 crosses the drainage. Historical mine features within <br />the Squaw Gulch drainage include: historical and residual waste rock stored behind the <br />Mary McKinney cribbing; spoils piles from old glory holes and adits located above <br />Highway 67, historical mill tailings deposited in Squaw Gulch below Highway 67 and <br />historic townsites of Anaconda and Mound City. <br />The current Cresson Project disturbance in the drainage consists of the SGOSA. The <br />SGOSA construction started in 1993. Rock placement in the SGOSA will continue <br />through approximately 2014 under the proposed MLE. The MLE also proposes to <br />extend the size and volume of the SGOSA to include the SGOSA extension. The limits <br />of the SGOSA extension are shown on Figure 1.2. <br />Surface Water <br />Surface water conditions in Squaw Gulch are assessed at four locations between the <br />stormwater sediment pond below the SGOSA and the confluence of the Squaw Gulch <br />and Cripple Creek: SG-05, SG-06, SG-07, and SG-10. Sample stations are shown on <br />Figure 3.1. The period of record, water quality statistics, streamflow data and field <br />parameter data summaries have been compiled for the sample stations SG-05, SG-06, <br />SG-07, and SG-10, and are provided in Tables A19 through A22 (Attachment A), <br />respectively. <br />Surface water flows in Squaw Gulch are seasonal and generally low (0 to 164 gpm). <br />Flows, if observed, occur in the spring due to snowmelt runoff and/or in the summer due <br />to seasonal rains and runoff. Flow rates, when multiple stations report flow, increase <br />downstream. <br />The surface waters in Squaw Gulch are characterized as calcium-sulfate waters. A <br />piper plot (Figure 3.6) shows the major ion water chemistry for the Squaw Gulch <br />drainage surface water stations. Data show that for samples collected in the same <br />monitoring period (usually the same day), pH values increase downstream from 4.2 su <br />(average) at SG-05 to 6.2 su (average) at SG-07. Nitrate values range from 0.61 to 5.8 <br />mg/L. Sulfate values generally increase in the downstream direction from 285 (average) <br />at SG-05 to 690 (average) at SG-10. <br />Groundwater <br />Groundwater conditions in Squaw Gulch are monitored via a network of three monitoring <br />wells and one shallow piezometer (Figure 3.1). The monitoring wells are designated <br />SGMW-3A (diatreme), SGMW-36 (alluvium/shallow diatreme), and SGMW-5 (granite). <br />Monitoring wells with the "B" designation are generally shallow and are screened in the <br />alluvium and the shallow bedrock. Monitoring wells with the "A" designation (or no <br />suffix) are generally deeper and are screened in the bedrock. The shallow piezometer is <br />2736 Cripple Creek & Victor Gold Mining Company <br />Water Management Consultants <br />