Laserfiche WebLink
Terror Creek road and the Hubbard Creek road. Also, please add a reference to the Cultural <br />Resources report as the description of prehistoric campsite 5DT1326 <br />The Division has no further concerns. Pages 2.05-102, 103 and 104 were revised appropriately in <br />the December 28, 2006 submittal and submitted again in the June 25, 2008 submittal. <br />10. Portions of the Hubbard Creek road and the Terror Creek road are mentioned in Section <br />2.05.6(6)(a)(ii)(A) on revised page 2.05-103. However, only portions of the Hubbard Creek road <br />are described in Section 2.05.6(6) (b) (i) (C) on revised page 2.05-105. Please revise page 2.05-105 <br />to include a description of the projected effects from subsidence on portions of the Terror Creek <br />road. <br />The Division has no further concerns. Page 2.05-106 was revised in the December 28, 2006 <br />submittal to state that subsidence will not affect the Tenor Creek road since the road is outside the <br />projected angle of draw. This statement was moved to revised page 2.05-107 in the submittal dated <br />June 25, 2008. <br />11. In order to aid in the review process and under Rule 2.05.6(6)(a)(ii)(B), please add depictions to <br />Map 27 for those portions of the Hubbard Creek road and the Terror Creek road that are within <br />the permit and adjacent areas. <br />The Division has no further concerns. In the submittal dated December 28, 2006, Map 27 was <br />revised to include depictions of the Hubbard Creek road and the Terror Creek road. <br />12. On revised page 2.05-107, under Section 2.05.6(6)C1)(i), it is stated that Map 27 depicts the depth <br />of cover. The depth of cover numbers are present but the contours are barely visible. Please revise <br />Map 27 to show the depth of cover contours clearly. <br />The Division has no further concerns. Map 27 was revised in the December 28, 2006 submittal. <br />13. On revised page 2.05-107, there is an entry for Rule 2.05.6(6)(c)(i)(F). However, this rule applies <br />to the subsidence monitoring program, which is relevant only if there is a determination of no <br />material damage or diminution of reasonably foreseeable use. In order to avoid any confusion, <br />please omit this rule reference and move the information concerning the cessation of the <br />subsidence monitoring program to the text pertaining to Rule 2.05.6(6)(t7(v)(B) where the <br />subsidence monitoring program is described. <br />The Division has no further concerns. As explained in item number 4 above, a determination of no <br />material damage was initially made for the Bruce Park Dam and Terror Creek Reservoir. However, <br />the Division requested that BRL revise the permit text in Sections 2.05.6(6) and 2.04.7(3) to <br />include a worst possible consequence of material damage and diminution of reasonably <br />foreseeable use to the Terror Creek Reservoir, but not to the Bruce Park main and saddle dams, <br />due to mine induced seismicity possibly causing the Bruce Park landslide to negatively affect the <br />Terror Creek Reservoir. The revisions were made in a complete subsidence section submittal, <br />permit application pages 2.05-99 through 2.05-125, and page 2.04-37, in the submittal dated June <br />25, 2008.