My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-07-23_PERMIT FILE - M2008009
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2008009
>
2008-07-23_PERMIT FILE - M2008009
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:34:54 PM
Creation date
7/25/2008 1:51:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2008009
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
7/23/2008
Doc Name
Recommendation for approval of application over objection
From
DRMS
To
Parties or Interested Person
Email Name
THM
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Division of Reclamation, Mining, and Safety (DRMS) Responses <br />The questions raised by the above comment are related to Rule 3.1.7 of the Construction Materials <br />Rules and Regulations, requiring the Operator to protect the existing and reasonably potential future <br />uses of groundwater not classified by the WQCC. The Operation will use standardized extraction <br />techniques related to aggregate removal that are not known to compromise the quality of groundwater <br />near these sites. Additionally, the operator has committed to installing a total of three monitoring wells <br />and will monitor the water levels twice a month for 4-6 months during the baseline monitoring period <br />and once a month during active de-watering at the proposed pit. Trigger points for implementation of <br />mitigation measures for the domestic wells during active pit dewatering have been set at a water level <br />drop of at least eight feet below the seasonal low water level elevations in the monitoring wells or if a <br />well user complains of a lack of water in their well. <br />Division Comment <br />The Division believes that the applicant is in compliance with the issue raised by these comments. <br />2. Rule 3.1.6(1) - Water General Requirements <br />The original comment letter states that there is concern for the protection of the Deep Cut Ditch <br />from water loss and pollutants. <br />Division of Reclamation, Mining, and Safety (DRMS) Responses <br />The questions raised by the above comment are related to Rule 3.1.6(1) of the Construction Materials <br />Rules and Regulations, requiring the Operator to minimize disturbances to the prevailing hydrologic <br />balance of the affected land and the surrounding area around to the quality and quantity of water in <br />surface and groundwater systems both during and after the mining operation and during reclamation. <br />With respect to pollutants as noted in the previous section the Operation will use standardized <br />extraction techniques related to aggregate removal that are not known to compromise the quality of <br />groundwater near these sites. The operator will also be required to obtain a discharge permit from the <br />Colorado Water Quality Control Division and these permits require spill prevention and control and <br />counter measure (SPCC) plan which will address spill containment. The original application planned to <br />use Deep Cut Ditch as a means of transport for de-watering activities; this is no longer the case. Water <br />from de-watering will be pumped into a sediment pond and then transferred to a Moffat county <br />drainage ditch north of Highway 394 via a 24" culvert. Bore holes were drilled along the north edge of <br />the Deep Cut Ditch and it was determined that a deep loam material underlies the Deep Cut Ditch. This <br />finding is consistent with the NRCS Soil Survey. A letter was received from the president of the Deep <br />Cut Ditch stating that there is sufficient clay under the ditch to protect the ditch from seepage during <br />the de-watering of the proposed Lyster Gravel Pit. Also, Lyster Oil Company has agreed to not mine <br />within 200 feet of the Deep Cut Ditch. <br />Division Comment <br />The Division believes that the applicant has adequately addressed the issue raised by these comments. <br />2
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.