My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-06-26_REPORT - C1980006
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Coal
>
C1980006
>
2008-06-26_REPORT - C1980006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:33:35 PM
Creation date
6/26/2008 3:21:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980006
IBM Index Class Name
REPORT
Doc Date
6/26/2008
Doc Name
2007 Annual Hydrology Report
From
Kerr Coal Company
To
DRMS
Annual Report Year
2007
Permit Index Doc Type
Hydrology Report
Email Name
JHB
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
134
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
AUL?n r <br />Laboratories, Inc. s <br />2773 Downhill Dnve Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 800 334-5493 <br />Kerr Coal Company ACZ Project ID: L59598 <br /> a <br /> <br />L59598-01 WG215926 Chloride M325.2 - Colorimetric RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br /> validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br /> accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). <br />WG215325 Nitrate/Nitrite as N, dissolved M353.2 - Automated Cadmium RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br /> Reduction validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br /> accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). <br />Nitrite as N, dissolved M353.2 -Automated Cadmium RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br /> Reduction validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br /> accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). <br />WG216165 Residue, Filterable (TDS) @180C M160.1 - Gravimetric HC Initial analysis within holding time. Reanalysis was past <br /> holding time, which was required due to a OC failure during <br /> the initial analysis. <br />WG216359 Sulfate SM4500 S04-D RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br /> validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br /> accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). <br />L59598-02 WG215926 Chloride M325.2 - Colorimetric RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br /> validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br /> accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). I <br />WG215325 Nitrate/Nitrite as N, dissolved M353.2 - Automated Cadmium RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br /> Reduction validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br /> accurate evaluation (< 10x MIDI-). i <br />Nitrite as N, dissolved M353.2 - Automated Cadmium RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br /> Reduction validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br /> accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). <br />L59598-03 WG215926 Chloride ` M325.2 - Colorimetric RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br /> validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br /> accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). <br />WG215325 Nitrate/Nitrite as N, dissolved M353.2 - Automated Cadmium RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br /> Reduction validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br /> accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). <br />Nitrite as N, dissolved M353.2 - Automated Cadmium M1 Matrix spike recovery was high, the method control sample <br /> Reduction recovery was acceptable. <br /> M353.2 - Automated Cadmium RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br /> Reduction validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br /> accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). <br />i <br />L59598-04 WG215926 Chloride M325.2 - Colorimetric RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />_ validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br /> accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). <br />WG215325 Nitrate/Nitrite as N, dissolved M353.2 - Automated Cadmium RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />lo <br />f <br /> Reduction w <br />or <br />validation because the sample concentration is too <br /> accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). I <br />Nitrite as N, dissolved M353.2 - Automated Cadmium M1 Matrix spike recovery was high, the method control sample <br /> Reduction recovery was acceptable. <br /> M353.2 - Automated Cadmium RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br /> Reduction validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br /> accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). <br />I <br />L59598-05 WG215926 Chloride M325.2 - Colorimetric RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br /> validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br /> accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). <br />WG215325 Nitrate/Nitrite as N, dissolved M353.2 - Automated Cadmium RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br /> Reduction validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br /> accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). <br />Nitrite as N, dissolved M353.2 - Automated Cadmium M1 Matrix spike recovery was high, the method control sample <br /> Reduction recovery was acceptable. <br /> M353.2 - Automated Cadmium RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br /> Reduction validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br /> accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). <br />REPAD.15.06.05.01 <br />I L59598: Page 11 of 17 <br />i
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.