My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-06-23_APPLICATION CORRESPONDENCE - C2008086
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Application Correspondence
>
Coal
>
C2008086
>
2008-06-23_APPLICATION CORRESPONDENCE - C2008086
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:33:24 PM
Creation date
6/23/2008 2:56:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C2008086
IBM Index Class Name
APPLICATION CORRESPONDENCE
Doc Date
6/23/2008
Doc Name
Responses/Comments and Concerns
From
J.E. Stover & Associates Inc
To
DRMS
Email Name
MPB
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2.04.7 Hydrology Description <br />MINE WATER INFLOW <br />The Red Cliff Mine will initially be developed in a dry coal seam. Based on <br />information from the McClane Canyon Mine, the only area of saturated coal <br />within the permit boundary will be the northeast corner. The projection of this <br />saturated zone is based on the approximate elevation the McClane Canyon <br />mine hit the saturated coal seal, the fact the Munger Canyon mine was dry, <br />and Cameo Seam monitoring well 8-3-10 is dry and monitoring well F-50 is in <br />a saturated zone. As stated above, modeling has predicted the pumping rate <br />from the Red Cliff Mine would average about 50 gpm to maintain <br />dewatered working conditions in the mine. <br />Should the Red Cliff mine discharge water, the water quality should be similar <br />to the McClane Canyon Mine discharge. McClane Canyon Mine's discharge <br />monitoring reports from 2002 to 2007 show Electrical Conductance (EC) <br />values ranging from 1,798 to 2030 with a average of 1918 umhos/cm, <br />TDS values ranged from 705 to 3250 with and average of 1814 mg/I and <br />pH ranged from 7.3 to 8.7 with an average of 8.1. Based on the analysis <br />of mine discharge presented in Volume III, Exhibit 3, iron concentrations <br />ranged from <0.01 to 0.07. Manganese concentrations ranged from <0.01 <br />to 0.057. <br />(4) A description of the maps prepared according to the standards of rule 2.10 <br />follows: <br />(4)(a) The locations of water supply intakes, ditches, reservoirs, and wells within a <br />one mile minimum radius of the affected area are shown on Map 23, Water <br />Rights Location. <br />Current users of surface water flowing into, out of, and within the hydrologic <br />area are the landowners who irrigate land along East Salt Creek and Big Salt <br />Wash. <br />The mine water discharge point, mine water flow path and sediment pond <br />outfalls are shown on Map 23. There are approximately 40,000 feet of <br />ephemeral channel between the mine discharge point and East Salt Creek. <br />Similarly, lengthy ephemeral channels separate the sediment ponds from Salt <br />• Creek. It is unlikely surface flow from the mine will reach East Salt Creek. <br />Permit Application <br />2.04-39 06/08
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.