My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-02-04_PERMIT FILE - C1982056A
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1982056A
>
2008-02-04_PERMIT FILE - C1982056A
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:22:05 PM
Creation date
6/5/2008 2:16:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982056A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
2/4/2008
Section_Exhibit Name
2.04 Environmental Resources
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
109
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Water quality in Middle Creek above Mine 3 (U.S.G.S. Station 09243700) is of magnesium-calcium sulfate- <br />• bicarbonate type. Total dissolved solids ranged from 434 mg/1 in April 1992 to 920 mg/1 in September 1992. Field <br />pH ranged from 8.6 units in June 1992 to 8.9 units in September 1992. Concentrations of total recoverable iron <br />ranged from 0.9 mg/1 in April 1992 to 9.7 mg/1 in September 1992. Total recoverable manganese concentrations <br />ranged from 0.8 mg/] on September 16, 1992 to 7.9 mg/1 on September 23, 1992. Total recoverable zinc <br />concentrations ranged from below detection limit in April 1992 to 0.2 mg/1 in September 1992. Other metals <br />analyzed were consistently below detection limit. <br />(31 Alternative Water Supply Information <br />The application shall identify the extent to which the proposed surface coal mining operations may <br />approximately result in contamination, diminution. or interruption of an underp~ound or surface source of water <br />within th~rooosedpermit area and adjacent areas for domestic. agricultural. industrial, fish and wildlife, or other <br />leeitimate use. If contamination, diminution, or interruption may result, then the description shall identify the <br />alternative source of water supply or sources of augmentations water that could be develooed to reRlace the <br />existing_sources. The alternate or substituted water shall be of a quality and quantity so as to meet the <br />requirements for which the water has normally been used. (See Articles 83 and 92 of Title 37 of the 1973 Colorado <br />Revised Statutes.) <br />RESPONSE <br />The adjudicated water rights in the Foidel Creek and Fish Creek water-sheds aze listed in Table 12, Summary of <br />Surface Water Rights. Included in the table are points of diversion, ownership, nature of use, annual usage in <br />cfs (flow rights) or acre-feet (storage rights). In general, adjudicated water is used for industrial, commercial and <br />domestic purposes; or agricultural and domestic use. The most senior adjudicated flow and storage rights in the area <br />• are owned by Twentymile Coal Company. <br />Irrigation ditches are utilized in the Twentymile Pazk basin to facilitate farming of forage crops such as grass hay and <br />alfalfa. The ditches are equipped with headgates for direct diversion from perennial streams, to be utilized in the late <br />Bowing season (August and September) when otherwise dry conditions exist. The irrigation ditches are listed in <br />Table 12, Summary of Surface Water Rights. Most of the ditches are abandoned; that is, they have not been used <br />since 1975, according to the 1976 irrigation year survey records at the Colorado Division of Water Resources <br />(CDWR) office in Steamboat Springs. Several of the ditches are currently listed in the 1984 CDWR Abandonment <br />List. <br />The extent of impact of underground mining operations on groundwater and surface water resources in the permit and <br />adjacent areas is identified and analyzed in the Protection of the Hydrologic Balance section under Rule 2.05.6 (3). <br />The impact of mining on the registered water rights listed in Table 12, Summary of Surface Water Rights, is based on <br />that assessment. <br />There are two aspects of the planned operations, which may affect sources of water for beneficial use; the first is <br />partial dewatering of the overburden aquifer, and the second is handling and treatment of excess water, <br />The overburden aquifer will be partially dewatered by inflow and subsequent pumping from the undergound <br />operations. Inflow to the mine may cause drawdown of water levels in adjacent water supply and monitor wells. <br />Quantitative estimates of inflow and drawdown are presented in the Protection of the Hydrologic Balance section <br />under Rule 2.05.6 (3). Because of the confined non-tributary nature of the overburden aquifer discussed under Rule <br />2.04.7 (1) above, dewatering will not cause any noticeable depletion of private wells within the general area, as <br />• documented under Section 2.05.6(3). <br />PR03-06 2.04-38 05/07/03 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.