My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2005-01-27_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - M1983052
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Minerals
>
M1983052
>
2005-01-27_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - M1983052
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/15/2024 11:50:57 AM
Creation date
6/4/2008 11:17:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1983052
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
1/27/2005
Doc Name
Complaint in civil action #04-F-2196 (OES)
From
Terry Hankins
To
Gale Norton
Email Name
CBM
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />IN THEUN3TED STATES DISTRICT COURT <br />FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO <br />Civil Action No. 04-F-2196(OES) p1/9 <br />Terry Hankins. <br />Plaintiff, <br />V. <br />Gale Norton, Secretary,of Interior, and <br />United States of America, <br />Defendants. <br />DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL TO DETERMINE FACTS AND ASSESS <br />DAMAGES OR COMPENSATORY ACTIONS <br />Formal demand is made here1gy for a Jury Trial to determine <br />facts and assess damages or compensatory actions, specifically: <br />1) Are my activities at the Ace#7 mine between August 1,2004 <br />and Dec. 3,2004 work that is "incidental to mining" and the <br />is my current occupancy of the Ace#7 claim justified and provided <br />for under the Mining Law, as laid out in detail in U.S.vShumway <br />and U.S v Lex. The Shumway case determined that "Locators of mining <br />claims have possession and rights for all practical purposes as <br />good as though patented." The Lex case(May 19,2003) determined <br />that "occupancy on mining claims on Forest Service is authorized <br />by MIning Law on a valid mining claim Is my current occupancy <br />justified under the MIning Law as per Shumway and Lex??? <br />2) Are BLM employees John Husband, Rob Ernst, John Marrone,
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.