Laserfiche WebLink
• 11 <br />Utah. Grand, San Juan, Wayne, and Garfield Counties. The Colorado River <br />and its 100-year floodplain from Westwater Canyon in T. 20 S., R. 25 E., <br />section 12 (Salt Lake Meridian) to full pool elevation, upstream of North <br />Wash, and including the Dirty Devil arm of Lake Powell in T. 33 S., <br />R. 14 E., section 29 (Salt Lake Meridian). <br />New Mexico. San Juan County: and Utah, San Juan County. The San Juan <br />River and its 100-year floodplain from the Hogback Diversion in T. 29 N., <br />R. 16 W., section 9 (New Mexico Meridian) to the full pool elevation at <br />the mouth of Neskahai Canyon on the San Juan arm of Lake Powell in <br />T. 41 S., R. 11 E., section 26 (Salt Lake Meridian). <br />Bioloay <br />Specific information on biological and physical habitat requirements of the <br />razorback sucker is very limited. Until very recently, fisheries research <br />investigations throughout the Upper Basin have focused on the three listed <br />Colorado River fishes, and data collected on the razorback sucker was largely <br />coincident to those studies. Localized extirpation of razorback suckers from <br />some localities, coupled with the species' continued decline in numbers and <br />distribution, has prompted some research; however, details of its life history <br />requirements, particularly in riverine environments, are still not fully <br />understood. <br />• In general, a natural hydrograph with a large spring peak, a gradually <br />descending limb into early summer, and low stable flows through summer, fall, <br />and winter are thought to create the best habitat conditions for endangered <br />fishes while maintaining the integrity of the channel geomorphology. Prior to <br />construction of large main stem dams and the suppression of spring peak flows, <br />low velocity, off-channel habitats (seasonally flooded bottomlands and <br />shorelines) were commonly available throughout the Upper Basin (Tyus and Karp <br />1989; Osmundson and Kaeding 1991). The absence of these seasonally flooded <br />riverine habitats is believed to be a limiting factor in the successful <br />recruitment of razorback suckers in their native environment (Tyus and Karp <br />1989; Osmundson and Kaeding 1991). Tyus (1987) and McAda and Wydoski (1980) <br />reported springtime aggregations of razorback suckers in off-channel <br />impoundments and tributaries; such aggregations are believed to be associated <br />with reproductive activities. Tyus and Karp (1990) and Osmundson and Kaeding <br />(1991) reported off-channel habitats to be much warmer than the main stem <br />river and that razorback suckers presumably moved to these areas for feeding, <br />resting, sexual maturation, spawning, and other activities associated with <br />their reproductive cycle. While razorback suckers have never been directly <br />observed spawning in turbid riverine environments within the Upper Basin, <br />captures of ripe specimens, both males and females, have been recorded (Valdez <br />et al. 1982; McAda and Wydoski 1980; Tyus 1987; Osmundson and Kaeding 1989; <br />Tyus and Karp 1989; Tyus and Karp 1990; Osmundson and Kaeding 1991; Platania <br />1990) in the Vampa, Green, Colorado, and San Juan Rivers. Sexually mature <br />razorback suckers are generally collected on the ascending limb of the <br />hydrograph from mid-April through June and are associated with coarse gravel <br />• substrates (depending on the specific location). <br />