Laserfiche WebLink
Letter: Response to adequacy review, Permit Application M-2008-010 4125/2008 page 8 <br />considered to be impermeables there will be little or no groundwater <br />flow through the Mancos shale, and no significant erosion of the shale <br />by the water flow through the permeable formation. Since the shale is <br />impermeable, there is little dissolving of its component salts by water <br />flowing through it: When exposed, the surface of the shale is subject to <br />erosion and freeze-thaw allowing for more release of salt. <br />9. Mancos Conservation District concerns about lining basins: <br />These are addressed in the above item. The District apparently <br />wishes to require that any basins and ponds on the site be lined with <br />synthetics, although existing ponds immediately adjacent to the site <br />and within the general area of the Mud Creek drainage do not have <br />synthetic liners, and many appear to be incised directly into the <br />Mancos shale. <br />In fact, the Mancos shale is impermeable enough that it is generally <br />allowed to serve as a component of lining systems for solid waste <br />facilities under RCRA Subtitle D federal regulations. The need for a <br />synthetic liner is not justified given the nature of the shale and the <br />potential exposure of water to that shale. If the potential for leaching of <br />salts from the Mancos shale in ponds and basins is such a significant <br />problem and can be reduced economically by synthetic liners, the <br />District could have included such measures in the current project to <br />improve water quality in the Mancos River watershed, and recommend <br />it of all existing~~and future ponds. To our knowledge, they have not <br />done so. <br />10. Mancos Conservation District concerns about surface flow: <br />Erosion is the major cause of release of salts from the shale.' The <br />"barrier to surface flow" referenced in the District comments, discussed <br />6 US EPA, www.epa.QOV/region8/compliance/nepa/negadocs/moabdeis1 pdf, and <br />www.epa.gov/ciconference/previous/2007/2007 presentations/wednesdav/830am/unc superfund <br />sits e.pdf <br />See William L. Jackson, Randall P. Julander (1982) RUNOFF AND WATER QUALITY FROM THREE <br />SOIL LANDFORM UNITS ON MANGOS SHALE' Journal of the American Water Resources <br />Association 18 (6) , 995-1001 doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.1982.tb00107.x [Messrs. Jackson and Julander are <br />hydrologists with the US BLM.] <br />ABSTRACT: Relative yields of water, sediment, and salt (as indexed by electrical conductivity) were <br />determined using simulated rainfall plots on three soil landform units on Mancos shale in the Price River <br />Basin, Utah. Final infiltration rates on residual shale derived soils were between 0.13 and 0.50 cm/hr. No <br />runoff was generated on cracked soils derived from aeolian deposits. Suspended sediment concentrations <br />and elehcal conductivities were 180 and 68 times greater, respectively, for a steep dissected Mancos shale <br />upland than for a low relief shale pediment and recent alluvial surface. Riling accounted for approximately <br />80 percent of the sediment produced on the steep, dissected shale surface. Channel scow and soil creep also <br />produced measurable mounts of sediment. A survey of sediment basins in steep, dissected shale up lands <br />indicated that an average of 1.25 Mg/ha/year of sediment is produced by that landform unit Carefully <br />designed and located basin plugs can be used effectively to trap sediment, water; and salt from dissected <br />shale uplands. <br />