My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-04-25_PERMIT FILE - M2008010
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2008010
>
2008-04-25_PERMIT FILE - M2008010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:28:34 PM
Creation date
5/9/2008 8:56:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2008010
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
4/25/2008
Doc Name
Adequacy Response
From
McStone Aggregates, LLC.
To
DRMS
Email Name
KAP
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Letter: Response to adequacy review, Permit Application M-2008-010 4/25/2008 page 7 <br />Recommendations from NRCS and Southwest Seeds (which <br />headquarters are located about 15 miles from this site) are that <br />fertilizer rates should be determined at the time of planting, since soil <br />conditions are likely to be quite variable, that mulch is not needed <br />except on slopes greater than 4H:1 V, where aspen excelsior <br />(manufactured in Mancos, approximately 2 miles away) can be applied <br />to cover the seeded area, and used as a mulch superior to straw mulch <br />and less likely to have weed seeds. Otherwise, straw mulch would be <br />applied at a rate of 2 tons per acre and crimped in to a depth of 3 <br />inches or less. Tackifier is not recommended. <br />7. Topsoil depth for reclamation: <br />The reference to "Rule (2)(f)(v) of this Exhibit" is confusing; please <br />explain. However, the depth of topsoil to be placed on areas to be <br />reclaimed to cropland or pasture land is stated in Exhibit I -Soils <br />Information (paragraph 6, third bullet) as twelve inches, which exceeds <br />the Mineral Rules and Regulations requirement. We apologize for the <br />error in the reference to this information on page 22 ("Topsoil" <br />paragraph) and page 23 (Section E-4), where Exhibit I is mistakenly <br />identified as B and Exhibit D is mistakenly identified as C. (These <br />items are shown in the errata sheet.) There is also a reference to <br />other exhibits provided at the bottom of page 23. 5 <br />8. ; ,Impact of reclamation and Mancos shale on water salinity: <br />Reclamation will cover Mancos shale exposed during mining. Since <br />backfilled material and topsoil will be placed on top of the shale (as on <br />a'll portions of the floor of the pit), the Mancos shale will not remain <br />exposed and surface runoff will not come in direct contact with the <br />shale, nor erode it away and thus dissolve salts out of the shale. <br />Without surface discharge, storm water which falls on Mancos shale <br />exposed on the floor of the pit during mining and before reclamation <br />will flow along the upper surface and either evaporate (thus leaving the <br />salts in place) or will flow through the remaining alluvium, just as if it <br />fell directly on the alluvium. Fines transported on the surface will be <br />deposited on the surface of the remaining alluvium and on the top of <br />the shale. Although the benefit of the filtration through these materials <br />will be limited for dissolved materials in the water, it will still provide for <br />a; purification process similar to the previous situation in which much of <br />the water soaked into the soil. Since Mancos shale is generally <br />s "Items specified for the Reclamation Plan in Rule 6 have been included in other items in <br />this Exhibit or have been included in other Exhibits referenced above, and therefore are <br />not separately listed in this exhibit." <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.