My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-04-25_PERMIT FILE - M2008010
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2008010
>
2008-04-25_PERMIT FILE - M2008010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:28:34 PM
Creation date
5/9/2008 8:56:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2008010
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
4/25/2008
Doc Name
Adequacy Response
From
McStone Aggregates, LLC.
To
DRMS
Email Name
KAP
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Letter: Response to adequacy review, Permit Application M-2008-010 4/2512008 page 11 <br />i. The three ponds on the Neva Property, located near the <br />northeast corner of the permit area, are partially incised and <br />partially retained by dams of up to 8 feet crest height, <br />constructed on the surface of the Mancos shale. The dams, <br />were clearly constructed using alluvium from above the <br />Mancos shale, and used some excavated shale as a core <br />and/or liner. (The shale also allowed the ponds to be deeper, <br />and larger capacity as originally built.) There are no known <br />geologic structures within the alluvium above the Mancos <br />shale which could be damaged by the mining as proposed, <br />or which would create planes for potential failure of a <br />cutbank. These ponds have silted in to a large degree, and <br />are approximately seven feet in depth. They are NOT on the <br />state's dam safety inventory. <br />ii. As proposed in Exhibit D, along this portion of the perimeter <br />the limits of excavation would approximate the final <br />reclaimed slope rather than creating a 20- or 30-foot highwall <br />to be backfilled. However, excavation will not extend into the <br />Mancos shale, and data on the exact contact between the <br />Mancos shale and the surface alluvium is not plentiful, but <br />indicates that the depth to the shale may be significantly less <br />than the 30-foot depth of mining proposed. <br />iii. The lowest earthen dam is located, as shown in Cross- <br />Section C-C', Figure E-4-1, page 24, 100 feet from the top of <br />the final reclaimed slope at the nearest point, and 200 feet <br />from the toe of that slope. The final reclaimed slope at this <br />point is 3.3:1. <br />iv. The middle earthen "dam" separating the two lower ponds is <br />located approximately 100 feet from the top of the final <br />reclaimed slope, which is actually at or above the elevation <br />of the crest of the "dam." The toe of the final reclaimed <br />slope is approximately 250 feet from the dam. The final <br />reclaimed slope at this location is 4:1, 30 feet in 120 feet. <br />v. The upper earthen dam holding the uppermost pond is <br />located approximately 50 feet from the top of the final <br />reclaimed slope, but that top is slightly higher than the <br />elevation of the crest of the dam. The toe of the final <br />reclaimed slope (still 4:1 at this point) is approximately 170 <br />feet from the dam. <br />vi. Based on the above information, there is no indication that <br />mining as proposed would have any potential to damage <br />these structures. <br />There is no blasting proposed for either mining or reclamation. <br />Therefore, there is no need for analysis by the Applicant to <br />demonstrate that off-site areas will not be adversely affected by <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.