My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-05-06_PERMIT FILE - M2008006
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2008006
>
2008-05-06_PERMIT FILE - M2008006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:29:15 PM
Creation date
5/8/2008 1:38:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2008006
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
5/6/2008
Doc Name
Non-party comment letter
From
Dan Stutzmann
To
DRMS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~ ~ w <br />Relford brought up the fact that this type of fencing exists further down the Poudre trail at <br />pits near Greeley. I bike the trail and I am very familiar with these pits and their fences. <br />They are atrocious. <br />At the meeting, The Connell representative, John, was asked what material would be used <br />to backfill the hole. He replied that the un-used portion of the mined product would be <br />used and that nothing would be trucked in. I don't see how this is possible. How can you <br />remove material down to 12+ feet and then backfill to the original grade with what is left <br />over? I'm not a geologist, nor a physicist, but I can figure that out. They will be trucking <br />in foreign material. In addition, what is left over from the mining operation will not be a <br />quality material. It will not sustain plant nor wildlife. In fact, I have personally seen <br />trucks hauling in sludge to the Poudre Heights pit mentioned by John several times. The <br />material does not come in aboard dump trucks, it comes in tankers. It is a vile looking <br />muck that is pumped out and into a pit that looks like it could be used by the Sopranos. I <br />have personally wondered if it is refuse from oil drilling operations. It appears so. <br />I personally asked John if there would be any chemicals used in the mining process. He <br />replied that there would not be. One of the homeowners then reminded him that he had <br />told her that there would be mag-chloride used for dust control. Mag-chloride is a <br />corrosive. Studies done by Colorado State University, UNC and others have shown that <br />magnesium chloride has a negative impact on vegetation and wildlife. In fact, Larimer <br />County has curtailed use ofmag-chloride in eco-sensitive areas. Heavy use of Mag- <br />chloride may indeed affect the health of the residents. The ecosystem of the river itself <br />would be endangered by this pit. <br />In our meeting on Apri124, 2008, we were told that this project would last 48 months, <br />plus 3 months to finish reclamation. There is no guarantee that this will indeed be the <br />time frame. There is no regulation, law or covenant that would provide any reinforcement <br />to timetables. Once approved, the owner and miners can do what they like, with no <br />recourse to the residents of Windsor. <br />I consider this project to be a rape of a valuable resource. It will endanger wildlife and <br />lessen the quality of life of the residents of River West, Ridge West, Bison Ridge and <br />indeed all of Windsor. It will steal money from the residents in the form of property <br />values. There are insufficient safeguards, laws and regulations to ensure that even if we <br />were willing to endure the hardship of the mining operation, that the end result would be <br />palatable. <br />I STRONGLY urge you to reject this project. <br />In fact, I urge you to continue with annexation of the land and exercise imminent domain <br />on the property. It is useless as a site for development, either for residential or <br />commercial use. Instead, I suggest that it be turned into a park. <br />We could name it Chris Serbousck Park! <br />Respectfully, <br />Daniel C. Stutzmann <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.