My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-04-21_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1992080
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1992080
>
2008-04-21_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1992080
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:28:16 PM
Creation date
4/22/2008 1:43:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1992080
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Date
4/21/2008
Doc Name
Proposed Decision & Findings of Compliance for SL3
From
Phase I on 30 Acres
Permit Index Doc Type
Findings
Email Name
TAK
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
41.S.C.6). Carbon Junction's approximate 100-acre surface disturbance probably is not <br />enough to diminish recharge to bedrock aquifers. <br />Surface Water Impacts: <br />There are no natural surface water features in the bond release area. Runoff from the coal <br />mine and the former sand and gravel operation is routed to sediment control ponds, then <br />discharges via CDPS outfalls at those ponds to the ephemeral stream channel in Carbon <br />Junction Canyon. Oakridge has conducted long-term monitoring at the two outfalls. The <br />ponds usually hold water only a few weeks each year following springtime snow melt and <br />large rainstorms. There have been no exceedances of discharge limitations at either outfall <br />for at least 5 years. The discharge limitations applicable to the outfalls were based on which <br />chemical constituents were likely to be present in discharge effluent, and did not include all <br />of the constituents for which there are instream standards in the Animas River, downstream <br />from Carbon Junction Canyon. It is unlikely, however, that the influent would have <br />contained these other constituents in significant amounts; therefore, it is reasonable to <br />conclude that operations in the bond release area are in compliance with the instream <br />standards. <br />Impacts to Alluvial Valley Floors (AVFs): <br />There are no alluvial valley floors within the influence of the Carbon Junction Mine. <br />Findings on Protection of Hydrologic Balance <br />All of the observed hydrologic impacts are consistent with those predicted in the Probable <br />Hydrologic Consequences section of the permit application and the Division's Animas River <br />Cumulative Hydrologic Impact Assessment. Based on the foregoing observations regarding <br />hydrologic impacts, the Division finds that Oakridge has minimized disturbance of the hydrologic <br />balance in the mine plan and adjacent areas, and prevented material damage outside the permit area. <br />The Division also finds that Oakridge has not caused hydrologic changes that adversely affect the <br />approved postmining land use in the permit area. <br />Findings on Completion of the Reclamation Plan <br />Oakridge requested Phase I release for regraded areas within an approximate 30-acre bond release <br />area. The Division reviewed the bond release application, the mine permit, and inspected the lands. <br />Based on the review and inspection, the Division finds that in the bond release area, Oakridge has <br />successfully completed backfilling, regrading, and drainage re-establishment in accordance with the <br />approved reclamation plan. <br />Application of Bond Release Phase Limits to Bond Release Request <br />The amount of bond applicable to the bond release area is $524,848. Phase I bond release is being <br />requested for the bond release area. Section 3.03.21imits the amount of bond that may be released in <br />6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.