My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-03-03_PERMIT FILE - C2006085 (16)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C2006085
>
2008-03-03_PERMIT FILE - C2006085 (16)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:24:01 PM
Creation date
3/25/2008 1:45:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C2006085
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
3/3/2008
Doc Name
Bishop-Brogden Hydrology Report
Section_Exhibit Name
Exhibit K
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
89
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ms. Angela Bellantoni <br />Apri125, 2007 <br />Page 4 <br />seam. We used GIS mapping software to compare the reported bottom of the wells to the <br />• structural top of the Ocean Wave coal seam. This comparison is presented in Appendix <br />3. The table in Appendix 3 presents the separation between the top of coal and the <br />bottom of wells in the field labeled "coal separation". Many wells are not located over <br />the Ocean Wave Coal seam or structural data were not available for the coal at the <br />location of the wells, and as a result, coal separation data are not presented for many of <br />the wells. As presented in the appendices, only one well (permit number 222887-A) was <br />identified that potentially penetrates the Ocean Wave coal seam, but we believe that that <br />well actually does not penetrate the coal as described below. In addition, we projected <br />the structural contours of the top of the coal elevation to the south to determine whether <br />or not any Chandler Heights wells (other than permit number 222887-A) potentially <br />penetrate the coal. This analysis indicated that none of the Chandler Heights wells <br />located outside of areas covered by Northfield's geologic mapping penetrate the coal. <br />Cross sections A - A' and B - B' (Appendices 1 and 2) illustrate the geologic setting and <br />the well completion interval information discussed above. The cross-section locations <br />are presented in Appendix 4. The cross-sections illustrate the separation between the <br />nearby wells both horizontally and vertically from the mine area and from the Ocean <br />Wave coal seam. The results of this evaluation of potential impact indicate that all the / ~ -7 <br />nearby wells are completed in shallower geologic units not hydraulically connected with v <br />the Ocean Wave coal seam. There appears to be one well potentially penetrating the <br />coal. This well, permit number 222887-A, was constructed in late 2006 to a depth of <br />. approximately 600 feet, and a Northfield representative visited the well site during the <br />construction process. The Northfield representative interviewed the well driller and <br />learned that the well did not penetrate the coal based on the driller's observations and <br />comments. However, we conservatively believe that the well may penetrate close to the <br />coal based on structural mapping of the coal seam and the reported well depth. We note <br />that the original well permit number 222887 was constructed to a depth of 697 feet, and <br />very likely penetrated the Ocean Wave coal seam. However, there was a requirement on <br />the replacement well permit that the old well be plugged and abandoned. <br />Projected Water Level Changes in Nearby Wells <br />We have completed analyses to determine the potential water level changes that may <br />occur in well permit number 222887-A, referenced above, as a result of the mining <br />operations, if the well penetrates the coal. As the coal seam is mined, it will be <br />dewatered, which acts like a pumping well or drain in the coal inducing ground water <br />flow towards the mine. As water flows towards the mine, it will result in water level <br />drawdowns within the coal seam. These water level changes will be greatest close to the <br />mine and will decrease with distance from the mine. Because of the aquitards above and !~-D <br />below the mine, the water level changes will be isolated to the Ocean Wave coal seam. <br />Also, because of the aquitards above and below the Ocean Wave coal seam, the <br />interbedded nature of the Vermejo Formation, the low hydraulic properties of the aquifer <br />and the horizontal distance that separates the mine from the well, we believe that this well <br />represents the worst case scenario for water level impacts to wells, if it penetrates the <br />coal. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.