My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-03-03_PERMIT FILE - C2006085 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C2006085
>
2008-03-03_PERMIT FILE - C2006085 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:24:03 PM
Creation date
3/20/2008 11:06:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C2006085
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
3/3/2008
Section_Exhibit Name
2.04 Information on Environmental Resources
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
. test data from residential water supply wells in well driller and pump <br />installation reports. These test data are informal but specific capacities <br />determined from these test data provide an indication of the low <br />aquifer transmissivity and hydraulic conductivity of these formations. <br />The table below presents a summary of representative well data, <br />including specific capacity values. The average specific capacity value <br />for these wells is 0.006. Base on EPA Ground Water Handbook, 1989, <br />and Ground Water and Wells, Johnson, 1986, multiplying the specific <br />capacity in a confied system by a factor of 2000, the estimated <br />transmissivity of the formation material is 12 gpd/ft. Assuming a <br />conservative low saturated thickness value of 50 feet, the estimated <br />hydraulic conductivity value is 0.24 gpd/ft2. This value is low and is in <br />line with vallues of tight silt and cemented sandstone. For the <br />purposes of comparison, we note that the hydraulic conductivity of <br />productive aquifer sands is on the order of 1000 to 5000 gpd/ft2, or <br />four orders of magnitude higher than the estimated hydraulic <br />conductivity of the formation material. <br />-~ <br />~J <br />Permit No. Pumping <br />Rate <br />(gPm) Static Water <br />Level (ft) Pumping <br />Water Level <br />(~) Drawdown <br />(ft) Specific <br />capacity <br />(gPm/ft of <br />drawdown) <br />248244 1 380 540 160 0.006 <br />243372 1 357 460 103 0.010 <br />248451 '~, 1 303 460 157 0.006 <br />248242 5 370 510 140 0.007 <br />222887 1 305 600 295 0.003 <br />A review and evaluation of nearby water supply wells was completed, <br />including well logs, well locations, and water level information. In <br />addition, thE~ potential impact of the mine operations on nearby wells <br />was evaluated. This research included a review of the well records for <br />wells within 1 mile of the permit boundary and a determination of <br />completion intervals for the nearby wells using GIS software. Based <br />on the analysis of completion interval and the geology of the mine <br />area, a comparison of the well completion elevation and Ocean Wave <br />elevations was completed. The results of this comparative analysis <br />indicate that: there is only one well of the 166 nearby wells that may be <br />completed in the Ocean Wave coal seam. <br />2.04-19 Revised 11/05/07 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.