My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-03-14_REPORT - C1981010 (5)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Coal
>
C1981010
>
2008-03-14_REPORT - C1981010 (5)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:25:13 PM
Creation date
3/14/2008 1:03:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010
IBM Index Class Name
REPORT
Doc Date
3/14/2008
Doc Name
2007 Annual Hydrology Report to Appendix A
From
Trapper Mining Inc
To
DRMS
Annual Report Year
2007
Permit Index Doc Type
Hydrology Report
Email Name
DIH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
107
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3.0 GROUND-WATER QUALITY <br />A ndix B resents the ound-water uali data for the Tra er Mine. This ndix <br />pI~ P ~' q tY PP ~I~ <br />tabulates all of the historical data in Table B-1 and presents TDS and sulfate plots versus time to <br />convey changes in the major constituent water quality. <br />Appendix B also presens the spring and seep water-quality data. Water quality for the <br />springs and seeps are included in this section because their source is ground water. Section 3.7 <br />presents a discussion of the spring and seep water-quality data. <br />3.1 TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS (TDS) <br />Figures B-1 through B-7 present plots of the TDS concentrations for the Trapper Mine <br />wells. The wells have been grouped together based on aquifers. <br />Figure B-1 presents the TDS concentrations versus time for two QR aquifer wells GD-2 and <br />- 1 GD-3 is a backfill well in the R uifer. TDS concentrations have been fairly steady <br />GD 3. We 1 Q aq <br />for the last nine years in well GD-3. The fluctuation in this bacldll aquifer is well within natural <br />ranges and may be very similar to variations that would have occurred in the QR aquifer at this <br />location. Some of the TDS in the backfill aquifer may be due to leaching from the backfill material. <br />The TDS in this backfill aquifer is greater than it is downgradient in the R Coal at GD-2 which <br />overall slightly decreased in 2007 but has been fairly steady for several years. <br />Figure B-2 also presents a group of three QR wells. Well GF-11 is an equivalent QR <br />aquifer well in the backfill. The 2007 TDS concentrations overall decreased in backfill well GF-11 <br />and is still below its peak in 2001 and 2002. Concentrations in the QR aquifer are monitored <br />downgradient at well GF-6 and have shown no influence from the upgradient mining, except for a <br />very slight overall increasing trend. These small changes are well within natural variations. Figure <br />Trapper Mining Company 3-1 <br />2007 Annual Report <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.